![]() |
|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,807
|
Re: **ANNOUNCEMENT**TheWarpath.net Teams Up with Tony McGee's Pro Football Plus
Quote:
__________________
"It's not about what you've done, but what's been done for you." |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Closet Redskins Fan
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 495
|
Re: **ANNOUNCEMENT**TheWarpath.net Teams Up with Tony McGee's Pro Football Plus
I finally read this post.
You guys do a great job. I appreciate all your efforts. Top level site!! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: **ANNOUNCEMENT**TheWarpath.net Teams Up with Tony McGee's Pro Football Plus
Check it out, we're front and center on their redesigned webpage:
http://www.redmagplus.com/ The first question should be read this week
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
I like big (_|_)s.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Age: 43
Posts: 19,264
|
Re: **ANNOUNCEMENT**TheWarpath.net Teams Up with Tony McGee's Pro Football Plus
Do we post the questions in here TAFKAS?
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: **ANNOUNCEMENT**TheWarpath.net Teams Up with Tony McGee's Pro Football Plus
Quote:
This whole thing is new for both Tony McGee and us and we're going to tinker with it a lot before we get it down exaclty how we want it.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
I like big (_|_)s.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Age: 43
Posts: 19,264
|
Re: **ANNOUNCEMENT**TheWarpath.net Teams Up with Tony McGee's Pro Football Plus
Yeah, before I got to know Daseal, I always thought his posts were a ray of brown stain.
LOL
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|