Looking at the draft.

[skinsfaninok]

Originally Posted by MTK

Fumbling can usually be coached up

we hope that is the case with 80 too...

[Irrefutable]

Originally Posted by MTK

Fumbling can usually be coached up

Matt Jones ?

[MTK]

To the ones willing to be coached and actually have some desire, yes

I did say “usually”

[Dan73]

Buffalo is calling around to see what it takes to move up.

Please let a QB drop and no one else trades with the Bills.

Sent from my SM-G955W using Tapatalk

[skinsfaninok]

Originally Posted by Dan73

Buffalo is calling around to see what it takes to move up.

Please let a QB drop and no one else trades with the Bills.

Sent from my SM-G955W using Tapatalk

The word up here is they only want Rosen or Mayfield, they are trying to trade up into the top 5. I don't see that happening.

[skinsfaninok]

Ranking all 15 Redskins first-round picks from the 2000s | NBC Sports Washington

[30gut]

Switching up my stance. I'm off Mayfield @ pick 13.
Partially because its rumored that he won't be there but more because I've been watching more YouTube cut-ups and I think Lamar Jackson is the sleeper prospect in this draft and if he's there at 13 you gotta take him.

[Irrefutable]

Originally Posted by 30gut

Switching up my stance. I'm off Mayfield @ pick 13.
Partially because its rumored that he won't be there but more because I've been watching more YouTube cut-ups and I think Lamar Jackson is the sleeper prospect in this draft and if he's there at 13 you gotta take him.

Lamar Jackson is RGIII 2.0

[Ivar the Boneless]

Originally Posted by Irrefutable

Lamar Jackson is RGIII 2.0

I agree 100%. The guy would have to gain like 20-30 lbs before I would even considering putting him out there. Guy is built like RG III, maybe even slimmer, plus his stats melt away when he is up against primo competition most of the time. He wouldn't have been so prolific in the SEC or even the Big Ten.

[Ivar the Boneless]

[QUOTE=30gut;1189096]Switching up my stance. I'm off Mayfield @ pick 13.
Partially because its rumored that he won't be there but more because I've been watching more YouTube cut-ups and I think Lamar Jackson is the sleeper prospect in this draft and if he's there at 13 you gotta take him.[/QUOT

We have bigger needs than at QB. We need RB, WR, and DB upgrades before QB. No decent running game=no playoffs for the foreseeable future. Also, the more I see of this QB class, the more I think it is overhyped.

[30gut]

To Ivar and refutable...how much of Lamar Jackson have you watched?

Since it appears we're not having a discussion and just posting 1 liners here's mine:

Lamar Jackson is Aaron Rodgers.

[DYoungJelly]

Originally Posted by 30gut

To Ivar and refutable...how much of Lamar Jackson have you watched?

Since it appears we're not having a discussion and just posting 1 liners here's mine:

Lamar Jackson is Aaron Rodgers.

My one liner is: I think it was a mistake not drafting a QB a few years ago.

[30gut]

Originally Posted by DYoungJelly

My one liner is: I think it was a mistake not drafting a QB a few years ago.

Lol, the irony is that you probably think your one liner is a dig against me when it's actually a dig at the poorly run front office for a QB debacle that some of you had your head too deep in the sand to deep to see.

So yeah, it's funny that they haven't drafted and developed QBs over the past few years.

[WillH]

With so many areas of need and the depth of this draft, trading back from 13th for additional picks is probably the best plan for the Redskins. I said the same last year, however, but somehow Allen fell to us and it was a no brainer. Sometimes a chance at an elite starter outweighs multiple shots at good starters. With that said, I've started thinking about who are the guys in this draft I would take at 13 over a trade back. There are at least 10 other guys if be very happy with at 13, but feel like we could still get if we traded back, they're not at a position of need, not a great fit, could get close value to at same position with a later pick, etc. Here's my list:

Barkley
B. Chubb
Fitzpatrick
Nelson
Edmonds
Smith
Ridley
Payne
Vea

Do you agree? What does your list look like?

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

[Schneed10]

Agree with trading back, a move to trade down and recoup a pick to help with the loss of Fuller would be wise. Fitzpatrick, Smith, and Payne are the three who are most appealing for me, personally, but there are others for sure. Ultimately I'm a fan of having more swings of the bat. Moving down to acquire more assets is a good move, if there's a willing trade partner.