When is Enough ,Enough?

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by Giantone

Since you seem to have the problem let me know how your move works out for you?

You said a 6-3 supreme court balance is a dangerous thing, not me.

Originally Posted by Giantone

It's beyond scary,it's dangerous.

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

You said a 6-3 supreme court balance is a scary thing, not me.

Please reread that post I did edit it.

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

You said a 6-3 supreme court balance is a dangerous thing, not me.

Yes I did and it is but please show me the post I said I would leave the country becuase of it,I'll wait.

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by Giantone

Yes I did and it is but please show me the post I said I would leave the country becuase of it,I'll wait.

You didn't. I never claimed you did. I stated it bluntly as an obvious option you should consider if a 6-3 court dangerous to you.

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

You didn't. I never claimed you did. I stated it bluntly as an obvious option you should consider if a 6-3 court dangerous to you.

LOL, you don't get it, a 6-3 court is dangerous no matter who you are politically...left or right. Like Matty said ...it's not a good thing.

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by Giantone

LOL, you don't get it, a 6-3 court is dangerous no matter who you are politically...left or right. Like Matty said ...it's not a good thing.

Here is an interesting article. https://fivethirtyeight.com/features...hey-get-older/ One that, I think, you could use to make the argument that it is better to start with a conservative nominee who gradually moves to center, then a liberal nominee who will go deeper to one side. That's not the main argument of the article, that's my opinion derived from it

Wikipedia has an article with good pictures of how the SC has been composed over the course of our county. We have had a 7-2 split on the court one time and the country has survived. And in fact during 1970 - 80 the court was a conservative 6-3 or 7-2(around 1980), and our country turned several positive corners in those years.

There is no historical precedent to say that a 6-3 court is dangerous, none.

The funnier thing is that for this current nomination, we aren't even talking about making the court 6-3. Just moving it to a 5-4 where Roberts, who is just above neutral by the analytics, becomes the swing vote.


from the wikipedia article


Another thing that graph seems to show, is that the country periodically goes through these "rebalancing periods" because the Justices do tend to age more towards more liberal decisions.

Pretty interesting studies for the 4th of July.

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

Here is an interesting article.

There is no historical precedent to say that a 6-3 court is dangerous, none.

.

There is no "historical precedent" for trump presidency,doesn't mean he can't fuck up the country.

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by Giantone

There is no "historical precedent" for trump presidency,doesn't mean he can't fuck up the country.

He has made this OK..................


https://www.yahoo.com/news/feel-raci...144808767.html