Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Redskins Signing Adrian Peterson

Locker Room Main Forum


View Poll Results: Grade the signing of Adrian Peterson (5 the best, 1 the worst)
5 11 26.19%
4 10 23.81%
3 13 30.95%
2 3 7.14%
1 1 2.38%
0 4 9.52%
Voters: 42. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-26-2018, 07:11 AM   #1
KI Skins Fan
Pro Bowl
 
KI Skins Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Jacksonville, Forida
Posts: 6,412
Re: Redskins Signing Adrian Peterson

Quote:
Originally Posted by sdskinsfan2001 View Post
Hopefully Peterson can handle 15-20 carries per game, Perine can handle 10-15 carries per game, and we can get CT the ball 5-10 times a game (thru runs or passes).
That sounds like the ticket to me. If we don't limit AP's carries, his effectiveness is probably going to diminish as it did last season. I hope he'll be able to accept a reduced role for the good of the team. To me, Perine looks much improved. He should be able to handle some of the load.
KI Skins Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2018, 02:17 PM   #2
CRedskinsRule
Living Legend
 
CRedskinsRule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 58
Posts: 21,698
Re: Redskins Signing Adrian Peterson

Quote:
Originally Posted by KI Skins Fan View Post
That sounds like the ticket to me. If we don't limit AP's carries, his effectiveness is probably going to diminish as it did last season. I hope he'll be able to accept a reduced role for the good of the team. To me, Perine looks much improved. He should be able to handle some of the load.
I would rather run AP into the ground, then use Perrine if needed. AP looks to be in good shape, hasn't had a ton of on field work, and right now looks to gives us the best chance to win every week. If Perrine gets healthy and beats him out then let Perrine start, but splitting carries is going to tick them both off, in an unproductive way.
CRedskinsRule is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2018, 02:38 PM   #3
GridIron26
Playmaker
 
GridIron26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Colorado
Age: 37
Posts: 3,593
Re: Redskins Signing Adrian Peterson

Quote:
Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule View Post
I would rather run AP into the ground, then use Perrine if needed. AP looks to be in good shape, hasn't had a ton of on field work, and right now looks to gives us the best chance to win every week. If Perrine gets healthy and beats him out then let Perrine start, but splitting carries is going to tick them both off, in an unproductive way.
Agree with this
GridIron26 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2018, 03:27 PM   #4
sdskinsfan2001
Living Legend
 
sdskinsfan2001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Hanahan, South Carolina
Age: 42
Posts: 20,579
Re: Redskins Signing Adrian Peterson

Quote:
Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule View Post
I would rather run AP into the ground, then use Perrine if needed. AP looks to be in good shape, hasn't had a ton of on field work, and right now looks to gives us the best chance to win every week. If Perrine gets healthy and beats him out then let Perrine start, but splitting carries is going to tick them both off, in an unproductive way.
15 carries a game would be 240 for the season. That would have been tied for 11th highest based on last years stats.
__________________
"You can be my wingman anytime."
"Bulls**t. You can be mine."
sdskinsfan2001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2018, 03:30 PM   #5
CRedskinsRule
Living Legend
 
CRedskinsRule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 58
Posts: 21,698
Re: Redskins Signing Adrian Peterson

Quote:
Originally Posted by sdskinsfan2001 View Post
15 carries a game would be 240 for the season. That would have been tied for 11th highest based on last years stats.
Ok, my point is I don't want a running back by committee. I want either AP or Perrine to be the guy, and right now, I think AP is a better option to start the season.

I also think if we do running back by committee, AP will be less manageable, he wants to "be the guy" or at least the chance to be.

Obviously CT is the 3rd down back always while healthy.
CRedskinsRule is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2018, 03:38 PM   #6
jamf
Pro Bowl
 
jamf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: San Diego Ca
Posts: 5,349
Re: Redskins Signing Adrian Peterson

Quote:
Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule View Post
Ok, my point is I don't want a running back by committee. I want either AP or Perrine to be the guy, and right now, I think AP is a better option to start the season.

I also think if we do running back by committee, AP will be less manageable, he wants to "be the guy" or at least the chance to be.

Obviously CT is the 3rd down back always while healthy.
I agree with this.
We need our best players to play.
I don't want to see anyone on a pitch count.

We need to win game.
jamf is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 2.40012 seconds with 12 queries