![]() |
|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Special Teams
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 473
|
Re: trading p ramsey
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: So. MD
Age: 47
Posts: 1,319
|
Re: trading p ramsey
Quote:
If Ramsey could develop into a solid, mid tier QB(Marc Bulger, Matt Hasselbeck, etc.), he would be far more valuable to the Jets than even a stud defensive end like Abraham. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: sparta, new jersey [ northern jersey ]
Age: 61
Posts: 3,097
|
Re: trading p ramsey
Everyone forgets Abraham sitting out the playoffs last season because he said he didn't want to jeopordize his upcoming contract, sounds like a real Gibbs type player, teams just may have a more favorable opinion of Ramsey than we do.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 80
|
Re: trading p ramsey
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 51
Posts: 5,311
|
Re: Trading Patrick Ramsey
Gee. I'm convinced. You guys are right. What else can you make out of a 23-33 record since 2002?
This front office is perfect. What was I thinking. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,620
|
Re: Trading Patrick Ramsey
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,832
|
Re: Trading Patrick Ramsey
Quote:
That's what we're talking about here, the current front office and the moves that have been made since Gibbs came back. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Contains football related knowledge
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Second Star On The Right
Age: 62
Posts: 10,401
|
Re: Trading Patrick Ramsey
Quote:
Nobody's is asserting the front office is perfect. What I and the majority of posters are saying is that, since Gibbs 2.0 came around, we have been more conservative in our signings. And, since Gibbs 2.0 began, we are 11 - 13 and likely to have an overall winning record at the end of two seasons. There has been a sea change at Redskins Park. The front office is marching to a different tune. Give credit where credit is due. Rabach, Griffin, Washington, Springs. Good solid signings. Don't expect to see anymore Deion or Bruce signings. Expect them to occasionally sign a big name or two IF he has the right attitude and isn't asking for the bank (a' la Musin Muhammed). Expect them to occasionally take a flyer on an injured pro on the comeback and willing to play cheap (Barrow, Walt Harris). Expect them to make quality offers to their homegrown guys but not promise them the moon. Expect them to look for quality team guys who they think can make a difference. Check back in 2007 - Then tell me what a crappy front office we have. I expect that it will continue to improve as Joe leaves his mark and teaches Danny a thing or two about how to run a sports team. Are they gonna continue to make mistakes? yup. Do they seem to have learned from past mistakes? yup. Are they in the class of the Eagles and Patriots in terms of respect? Nope. Are they headed in that direction? Yup. Sometimes I think people just gotta have something to bitch about. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 922
|
Re: Trading Patrick Ramsey
Quote:
__________________
Run or Pass and Score ..We Want Alot More!!!! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
|
Re: Trading Patrick Ramsey
Quote:
Looking at the front office and the current Redskins staff in place, which makes perfect sense, the only real disappointment has been Mike Barrow. Well gee...ya know, one bad move out of all the other ones is a pretty good track record in my opinion.
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!" |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,620
|
Re: Trading Patrick Ramsey
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|