Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


The Top Ten Reasons Why The Skins Are Contenders!

Locker Room Main Forum


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 11-11-2005, 11:56 AM   #9
skinnyfan
Special Teams
 
skinnyfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Age: 48
Posts: 111
Re: The Top Ten Reasons Why The Skins Are Contenders!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big C
also look at the teams we have played on the road.

broncos 6-2
chiefs 5-3 (i think)
giants 6-2
cowboys 5-3

all those games came down to the end except the giants of course

when we get some weaker teams on the road it will not be a problem

You make good points, and I realize who we've played and what kind of record they pull. We can't "woulda coulda shoulda" the season though. Although the Denver and KC game was good we still did not win, which is a concern. We turn the ball over way too much on the road to win ballgames. We need to protect the ball this weekend if we are to score enough to win. And who would you consider a "weak team" that we play on the road the remainder of this year? (besides maybe Arizona, and even they could very easily beat us.)

1. Bucs..........#1 defense in the league
2. Rams..........pretty damn good team under the dome
3. Cards.........not a hateful defense and could give us trouble
4. Eagles........they are still the NFC champions until I see the wheels come totally off!
skinnyfan is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.10452 seconds with 11 queries