![]() |
|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Hug Anne Spyder
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,577
|
Re: Why moving on from Bruce Allen this year is pivotal to the future of the franchise.
Quote:
If Gruden wasn't allowed to create his own hierarchy with his own hand picked assistants he was doomed from the start. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Parkton, MD
Posts: 5,798
|
Re: Why moving on from Bruce Allen this year is pivotal to the future of the franchise.
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,300
|
Re: Why moving on from Bruce Allen this year is pivotal to the future of the franchise.
Quote:
Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk
__________________
I'm tired of these monkey fighting snakes on this Monday to Friday plane! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
The Starter
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Beaverdam Virginia
Age: 64
Posts: 2,137
|
Re: Why moving on from Bruce Allen this year is pivotal to the future of the franchise.
He isn't head coaching material at the NFL level. For one thing he is way too soft, his team lacks discipline on and off the field.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 58
Posts: 21,701
|
Re: Why moving on from Bruce Allen this year is pivotal to the future of the franchise.
Quote:
Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,300
|
Re: Why moving on from Bruce Allen this year is pivotal to the future of the franchise.
Quote:
But, Finlay, Sheehan, and Phillips from the Richmond times dispatch have talked about it on podcasts since Callahan's hire. And it's a total Bruce move. Dallas has a good run game, let's hire yet another Dallas Cowboy, whether he fits here or not. Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk
__________________
I'm tired of these monkey fighting snakes on this Monday to Friday plane! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|