Will the Current Treatment of HASKINS Effect His Tenure and Performance with the Redskins?

[SunnySide]

I think a lot of us were just happy they didnt trade a bundle to move up and get him. I was "fine" with the Haskins pick at 15.

Payne over Derwin James still pisses me off though. Compound the angts by giving an in the box Landon Collins 45M guar over the next 3 years. Collins seems to stay healthy though which can not be discounted.

[Schneed10]

Originally Posted by SunnySide

I think a lot of us were just happy they didnt trade a bundle to move up and get him. I was "fine" with the Haskins pick at 15.

Payne over Derwin James still pisses me off though. Compound the angts by giving an in the box Landon Collins 45M guar over the next 3 years. Collins seems to stay healthy though which can not be discounted.

I won't judge the Landon Collins signing until I see what a better defensive coaching staff can get out of him. Manusky calls games like a pussy and schemes up the softest zones around. A coach with a more aggressive style could get a lot more out of Collins.

[Buffalo Bob]

Originally Posted by Schneed10

I won't judge the Landon Collins signing until I see what a better defensive coaching staff can get out of him. Manusky calls games like a pussy and schemes up the softest zones around. A coach with a more aggressive style could get a lot more out of Collins.

When Jim Harbaugh took over in SF Manusky was canned and replaced with Fangio, the 49er defense went from 16th to 2nd pretty much utilizing the same personnel. What does that tell you?

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by Buffalo Bob

When Jim Harbaugh took over in SF Manusky was canned and replaced with Fangio, the 49er defense went from 16th to 2nd pretty much utilizing the same personnel. What does that tell you?

But we are keeping Manusky right?

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

[mooby]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

But we are keeping Manusky right?

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

Yeah I think Callahan said he's not making any staff changes.

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by mooby

Yeah I think Callahan said he's not making any staff changes.

Awesome

[SFREDSKIN]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

But we are keeping Manusky right?

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

The guy everyone wanted gone is staying

[Skinsfanatic]

Originally Posted by SFREDSKIN

The guy everyone wanted gone is staying

There is always the chance Gruden was instructing.Manusky to coach the defense a particular way and.that Callahan will let him be a better coach.

[mooby]

Originally Posted by Skinsfanatic

There is always the chance Gruden was instructing.Manusky to coach the defense a particular way and.that Callahan will let him be a better coach.

Yes, even if the chance is 5% you can't completely rule out an offensive minded head coach telling the defensive coordinator how to do his job.

I guess Manusky has to suck under Callahan first before Callahan will let him go.

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by Skinsfanatic

There is always the chance Gruden was instructing.Manusky to coach the defense a particular way and.that Callahan will let him be a better coach.

I think more likely, but still unlikely, is Callahan thinks the problem is Grudens lax attitude, and he will change that thus the defense will improve in effort

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

[SFREDSKIN]

Originally Posted by Schneed10

I won't judge the Landon Collins signing until I see what a better defensive coaching staff can get out of him. Manusky calls games like a pussy and schemes up the softest zones around. A coach with a more aggressive style could get a lot more out of Collins.

Collins played a hell of a lot better for the Giants, so I agree about Manusky but not putting him a place to succeed, that goes for the whole
D.