Coronavirus (political)

[BaltimoreSkins]

If you don't think the federal government offering money and competitors taking that $ to develop a vaccine lit a fire under Pfizers butt to be first. That is your prerogative. I've worked in plenty of industries to know otherwise.

[jamf]

Originally Posted by BaltimoreSkins

If you don't think the federal government offering money and competitors taking that $ to develop a vaccine lit a fire under Pfizers butt to be first. That is your prerogative. I've worked in plenty of industries to know otherwise.

This is so wrong.

100% of the world needs this vaccine, you think 4% of the population lit a fire?



The first to market will easily earn billions if not a trillion dollars and the creator will get a Nobel Peace prize and become the next Jonas Salk.



It's hilarious you think some brilliant chemist is sitting there saying

"Trump called, he says he can get us distribution at walmart and all the piggly wigglys, we better get this vaccine before anyone else"

[BaltimoreSkins]

Originally Posted by jamf

This is so wrong.

100% of the world needs this vaccine, you think 4% of the population lit a fire?



The first to market will easily earn billions if not a trillion dollars and the creator will get a Nobel Peace prize and become the next Jonas Salk.



It's hilarious you think some brilliant chemist is sitting there saying

"Trump called, he says he can get us distribution at walmart and all the piggly wigglys, we better get this vaccine before anyone else"

I hear what your saying but hasn't the US said it is going to role with a US company and not use a European or Asian company for supply? I guess that could change on January 20. I am just saying a federal subsidy provides additional resources and will promote growth in that research. I highly doubt they were waiting for that subsidy as you suggest that I am suggesting.