![]() |
|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
MVP
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 10,164
|
Re: Mark Brunell for Pro Bowl?
Quote:
Overall I think Hassleback is a lock, Delhomme probably is 2nd and the third spot is between Brunell and Eli. Who knows which way that goes. I think both have had some good moments and some not so good moments. Either way in normal eyar neither gets a nod. Guys like McNabb and Culpepper will alwasy go ahead. If Brad Johnson had a few more games under his belt he'd be a lock. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
MVP
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,460
|
Re: Mark Brunell for Pro Bowl?
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Most Interesting Man in the World
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Age: 38
Posts: 8,606
|
Re: Mark Brunell for Pro Bowl?
Ok I know you guys will laugh at this question, but is the Pro Bowl selection 100% fan choice? Because if it is I do not think Brunell will get it. If its not and it is a combination of media and whatever else, I think he might. Nevertheless, I doubt he will be a starter, simply because Brunell has not been consistent throughout the year. There were some games where he looked really bad. But at the same time who else has not been inconsistent in the NFC. Pretty much all the QB's have had ups and downs. God I hope Vick doesn't get in, hes a great athlete but he is a terrible QB, and I do not think he will ever win a SuperBowl. I think I saw some sports writer who said that too, but I think its simply because he is NOT a good pocket passer, and all the good teams in the NFL mainly have pocket passer. Anyways that is a totally different debate, end of my rambling.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,832
|
Re: Mark Brunell for Pro Bowl?
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
MVP
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,460
|
Re: Mark Brunell for Pro Bowl?
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|