The Argument for Team Chemistry?

MTK · 03-13-2006, 02:18 PM

Personally I don't think it will be an issue especially with this coaching staff.

The one part of the team that would concern me the most chemistry-wise has it, the offensive line.

jermus22 · 03-13-2006, 02:22 PM

Good post, Matty. While I know I've made a fuss about the Archuleta/Clark situation, I agree that most of our signings seem to have been very sensible. I also agree that Gibbs and the rest of the coaching staff should manage to keep things together. Hopefully this year will be even better than last.

03-13-2006, 02:18 PM	#1
MTK \m/ Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 52 Posts: 99,832	Re: The Argument for Team Chemistry? Personally I don't think it will be an issue especially with this coaching staff. The one part of the team that would concern me the most chemistry-wise has it, the offensive line. __________________ Support The Warpath! \| Warpath Shop

03-13-2006, 02:22 PM	#2
jermus22 Special Teams Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Frankfort, KY Age: 43 Posts: 336	Re: The Argument for Team Chemistry? Good post, Matty. While I know I've made a fuss about the Archuleta/Clark situation, I agree that most of our signings seem to have been very sensible. I also agree that Gibbs and the rest of the coaching staff should manage to keep things together. Hopefully this year will be even better than last. __________________ Win it in the trenches.

The Argument for Team Chemistry?

Locker Room Main Forum