Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Lloyd or Randle El?

Locker Room Main Forum


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 05-14-2006, 03:25 PM   #2
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
Re: Lloyd or Randle El?

Quote:
Originally Posted by NicknacK89
Which new addition to the redskins passing game is going to have a bigger impact? I say el because of all the different things he can do
Right on the money. I believe you have Randle El out there for versatility. He's quicker than Lloyd, and makes your defense account for so many more things than Lloyd does. Lloyd should see a lot of playing time as a split end only, whereas Randle El and Moss can alternate between split end and slot.

A lot of times last year, Moss was the slot reciver and did a lot of seal blocking on running plays. They like him there because hes not a great stalk blocker. But I think he will be forced to play more of a split end this year opposite Lloyd/Fauria.

On obvious passing downs from the gun, Cooley might play a true TE, and with Lloyd at split end, both Moss and Randle El can play slots and motion/shift etc. It will be incredibly difficult to match up with us presnap.

I get goosebumps just thinking about it.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 2.40000 seconds with 11 queries