Pastabelly thinks Patten will get axe

BrudLee · 05-30-2006, 08:02 PM

I think that Gibbs and company have placed a premium on depth at a position where up to five of the same position can be on the field at the same time. Does it make sense to have a very good (if a little expensive) #4 WR? It does if you need to be in a four receiver set, and you'd rather throw to Patten than Taylor Jacobs, or James Thrash, or Antonio Brown, or Jimmy Farris.

The only way this move happens is if Patten asks to leave.

05-30-2006, 08:02 PM	#14
BrudLee Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Rehoboth Beach, DE Posts: 3,494	Re: Pastabelly thinks Patten will get axe I think that Gibbs and company have placed a premium on depth at a position where up to five of the same position can be on the field at the same time. Does it make sense to have a very good (if a little expensive) #4 WR? It does if you need to be in a four receiver set, and you'd rather throw to Patten than Taylor Jacobs, or James Thrash, or Antonio Brown, or Jimmy Farris. The only way this move happens is if Patten asks to leave. __________________ There's nowhere to go but up. Or down. I guess we could stay where we are, too.

Pastabelly thinks Patten will get axe

Locker Room Main Forum