Is James Thrash more Buck for the Bang?!?

amorentz · 06-01-2006, 10:09 AM

At this point in the game I think there is no reason to cut ANYONE for being too expensive. We are under the salary cap with plenty of money to sign our rookies and have an IR fund. Are we trying to save Snyder some money here? We need to keep the most talented guys on the roster, and I believe that Thrash, with his special teams skills, is definitely one of those guys. But if someone beats him out in camp, so be it...I just dont think its likely to happen!

To reiterate my point about Thrash (and Patten): We are under the cap. Why try to save money?

06-01-2006, 10:09 AM	#18
amorentz Special Teams Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Washington, DC Age: 45 Posts: 368	Re: Is James Thrash more Buck for the Bang?!? At this point in the game I think there is no reason to cut ANYONE for being too expensive. We are under the salary cap with plenty of money to sign our rookies and have an IR fund. Are we trying to save Snyder some money here? We need to keep the most talented guys on the roster, and I believe that Thrash, with his special teams skills, is definitely one of those guys. But if someone beats him out in camp, so be it...I just dont think its likely to happen! To reiterate my point about Thrash (and Patten): We are under the cap. Why try to save money?

Is James Thrash more Buck for the Bang?!?

Locker Room Main Forum