Trade WR

SmootSmack · 03-05-2004, 12:03 AM

I don't believe we should be in the business of helping out division opponents. So what if the Eagles need Wide Receivers. Let them find some on their own.

Portis · 03-05-2004, 12:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smootsmack

I don't believe we should be in the business of helping out division opponents. So what if the Eagles need Wide Receivers. Let them find some on their own.

See if it was Coyboys I would never suggest this, but since its eagles I can say that what ever WR they will get will most likely fail. They have taken WR as high draft pick and even they have failed. There has to be somthing wrong with WR coach or the system somewhere bc when u have a QB like McNab, with his talents and arm the system should produce a 1000 yards WR. No matter who the WR is.

Gmanc711 · 03-05-2004, 12:19 AM

If they want one of our wideouts, they can have Rusell or P.Johnson. I really dont wanna see McCants there, cause I lvoe that guy and wouldnt wanna cheer vs him

CrazyCanuck · 03-05-2004, 12:36 AM

I really hope they keep them all, especially McCants. The guy was solid last year, he's young, he loves coach Gibbs, and he wants to be here.

Let Gardner, McCants, Jacobs all battle it out in camp. They are a great young core that are cheap and can be kept (along with Coles) for a long time. Let's see who steps up before we unload any of them.

If our O line is as great as everyone says (yes I'm talking to you Samuels), our offense is looking scary.

That being said, we are short on picks, and WR is the only position we have the depth to trade from, so I'll understand if they do decide to trade one of them.

CrazyCanuck · 03-05-2004, 12:43 AM

And I think trading one of them to one of our division rivals is a MUST NOT.

I don't care what they offer.

SittingBull · 03-05-2004, 01:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CrazyCanuck

And I think trading one of them to one of our division rivals is a MUST NOT.

I don't care what they offer.

What about TO for Gardner and Jacobs? Mccants can only get better and contributed alot last season for bottom dollar. You cant blame me for dreaming :p

Defensewins · 03-05-2004, 11:41 AM

We can't afford TO. Gardner and Jacobs are cheap.
Although I think drafting Jacobs last year was a huge mistake when we could of had Saftey Mike Doss. Doss started all year at SS for the Colts, had 101 tackles and helped the Colts to one game from the Superbowl.
Mattt Bowen (our SS) had only 74 tackles.
It is amazing that a rookie outplayed a 4-5 year veteran.

MTK · 03-05-2004, 12:12 PM

A 2nd rounder for Gardner when Owens was just had for a 2nd?? I don't think so.

Jacobs for a first? Ummm, right. Don't think so.

We'd be extremely lucky to get a low 2nd for Gardner, more likely a 3rd though. As for Jacobs, maybe a 4th or a 5th? Who is going to give up anything higher than that for a 2nd year WR who did absolutely nothing in his rookie year??

celts32 · 03-05-2004, 01:07 PM

Jacobs & Mccants have virtually no trade value and Coles & Gardner are starters so trading one of them just turns a strength into yet another question mark. Bad idea...

03-05-2004, 12:03 AM	#1
SmootSmack Uncle Phil Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 45,256	I don't believe we should be in the business of helping out division opponents. So what if the Eagles need Wide Receivers. Let them find some on their own. __________________ You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You

03-05-2004, 12:19 AM	#3
Gmanc711 Thank You, Sean. Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Gaithersburg, MD Age: 39 Posts: 7,506	If they want one of our wideouts, they can have Rusell or P.Johnson. I really dont wanna see McCants there, cause I lvoe that guy and wouldnt wanna cheer vs him __________________ #21

03-05-2004, 12:36 AM	#4
CrazyCanuck Serenity Now Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Canada Posts: 2,008	I really hope they keep them all, especially McCants. The guy was solid last year, he's young, he loves coach Gibbs, and he wants to be here. Let Gardner, McCants, Jacobs all battle it out in camp. They are a great young core that are cheap and can be kept (along with Coles) for a long time. Let's see who steps up before we unload any of them. If our O line is as great as everyone says (yes I'm talking to you Samuels), our offense is looking scary. That being said, we are short on picks, and WR is the only position we have the depth to trade from, so I'll understand if they do decide to trade one of them.

03-05-2004, 12:43 AM	#5
CrazyCanuck Serenity Now Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Canada Posts: 2,008	And I think trading one of them to one of our division rivals is a MUST NOT. I don't care what they offer.

03-05-2004, 11:41 AM	#7
Defensewins Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Houston, Texas Posts: 3,765	We can't afford TO. Gardner and Jacobs are cheap. Although I think drafting Jacobs last year was a huge mistake when we could of had Saftey Mike Doss. Doss started all year at SS for the Colts, had 101 tackles and helped the Colts to one game from the Superbowl. Mattt Bowen (our SS) had only 74 tackles. It is amazing that a rookie outplayed a 4-5 year veteran.

03-05-2004, 12:12 PM	#8
MTK \m/ Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 52 Posts: 99,832	A 2nd rounder for Gardner when Owens was just had for a 2nd?? I don't think so. Jacobs for a first? Ummm, right. Don't think so. We'd be extremely lucky to get a low 2nd for Gardner, more likely a 3rd though. As for Jacobs, maybe a 4th or a 5th? Who is going to give up anything higher than that for a 2nd year WR who did absolutely nothing in his rookie year??

03-05-2004, 01:07 PM	#9
celts32 Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Hackettstown NJ Age: 54 Posts: 2,665	Jacobs & Mccants have virtually no trade value and Coles & Gardner are starters so trading one of them just turns a strength into yet another question mark. Bad idea...

Trade WR

Locker Room Main Forum