My 2006 TO Prediction

[scowan]

Let's see..... T.O. did not play against the Skins in 05, and in 04 he caught 2 for 24 with 1 TD in his first adventure against the Skins and 6 for 46 in his second meeting. The Eagles won both of those games back in 2004, but T.O. really was a non factor. T.O. talks a lot of smack and is a great player, but if he gets hit a lot in a game, I don't think he does much. If Arch and Taylor smack him early, he won't be much of a factor. Heck, if they smack Bledslow a few times, T.O. will never even see the ball!

[5RINGS]

Originally Posted by scowan

Let's see..... T.O. did not play against the Skins in 05, and in 04 he caught 2 for 24 with 1 TD in his first adventure against the Skins and 6 for 46 in his second meeting. The Eagles won both of those games back in 2004, but T.O. really was a non factor. T.O. talks a lot of smack and is a great player, but if he gets hit a lot in a game, I don't think he does much. If Arch and Taylor smack him early, he won't be much of a factor. Heck, if they smack Bledslow a few times, T.O. will never even see the ball!

So using your logic, the Eagles could have used Keary Colbert at WR and they still would have beat the Redskins.

Because from what I have read, Washington handles TO so well, they are considering using a cheerleader to cover TO on first down so as to keep the secondary fresh.

Why even bother covering him? He will just short arm the pass anyway. And If Taylor is even in the stadium, TO will soil himself.


Just to be clear, I think that the Redskins have the best chance to go to the SB as the NFC rep. (as long as Brunell stays healthy)

I also think that they go 11-5.


I also think that TO is a major issue for every Def Co-ordinator that Dallas plays this year.