![]() |
|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
View Poll Results: Is it time to bench Brunell? | |||
Yes |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
141 | 61.84% |
Give him another week |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
37 | 16.23% |
Give him a few more weeks |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
35 | 15.35% |
No |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
15 | 6.58% |
Voters: 228. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#76 | |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Time to bench Brunell?
Quote:
Nice post though, I agree with what you say
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Advertisements |
![]() |
#77 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,620
|
Re: Brunell Solely Responsible for Loss?
its not just him, but i think he is a primary cause, and i'm not really sure saunders was really needed that badly.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#78 |
MVP
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 63
Posts: 10,672
|
Re: Time to bench Brunell?
if brunell isnt grasping this offense, it makes absolutely no sense to stick j campbell as the starter. learning the ins and outs of the nfl is complicated enough without trying to learn a new offense for like the 6th year in a row
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt." courtesy of 53fan |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#79 |
MVP
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 63
Posts: 10,672
|
Re: Time to bench Brunell?
we seriously need to try and throw the ball alittle over 20 yards when its not third and long. our playcalling was horrible. are they trying to protect brunells arm strength? only the coaches know that answer
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt." courtesy of 53fan |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#80 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Clinton (as in Portis) New Jersey
Age: 64
Posts: 217
|
Re: Time to bench Brunell?
I think putting in Campbell against the Texans would be the best game to do it. They are one of the weaker opponents we are going to face this year. I don't know how many more games I can get my hopes up so high, just to be dashed. We looked worse than the last playoff game against Seattle. I really did not think it could get worse than that. I am aware of the new offense and all that but we bring in 2 new recievers and we are only able to get the ball to them 2 times? Lloyd has 2 games under his belt and 1 catch. I think we start Campbell next game and see what happens. Could he be any worse?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#81 |
The Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,351
|
Re: Time to bench Brunell?
Brunell is not going to take us to a SB. That is clear. He can't make plays. He can't make things happen. He looked real slow out there.
I'm not sure benching him right now is the answer. We've got a shot at 2 W's in a row. Maybe... Looks bad right now. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#82 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Northern,Va.
Posts: 2,706
|
Re: Brunell Solely Responsible for Loss?
I like Brunell , but he just does not have it . I also believe that our takles need to pass protect MUCH better , and we better get some pass rushers next year , A Carter ,,, what did they see in him , he has not come close to the qb once .
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#83 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: 129 W 81st street
Age: 46
Posts: 3,503
|
Re: Time to bench Brunell?
Quote:
The future is now for the Redskins! Start Campbell NOW!! If Brunell starts the next 2 weeks, we will be 1-3 for sure. We will beat Houston but we will NOT beat Jacksonville with MB at QB. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#84 | |
Special Teams
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 395
|
Re: Brunell Solely Responsible for Loss?
Quote:
Could not agree more. We have arguably the best receiving core in the NFL and Brunell does not evan try to get it too them. Something is really wrong. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#85 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: 129 W 81st street
Age: 46
Posts: 3,503
|
Re: Time to bench Brunell?
...and to anybody who thinks we are overreacting because its only been 2 games, you are fooling yourself. MB might not make alot of mental mistakes but he sure doesn't do anything to win games either. The redskins are in serious trouble right now. If this offense takes so long to grasp, what purpose does it serve to have a 36 year old guy playing qb? he isn't our future so all you are accomplishing at this point is delaying the inevitable. It would make more sense to me to play JC now so he can get the experience. You never really know how he will react until he get some real playing time in a real game. I appriciate what MB did last year but it is clear that the QB in this scheme needs to make plays and he just does not have what it takes anymore.
Last edited by gibbsisgod; 09-18-2006 at 08:12 AM. Reason: start campbell now. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#86 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: New Jersey
Age: 43
Posts: 5,455
|
Re: Bench Brunell
Quote:
__________________
"I'm used to winning, coming from the University of Miami. " Clinton Portis |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#87 |
The Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Bristol, CT
Age: 61
Posts: 1,001
|
Re: Brunell Solely Responsible for Loss?
Brunell looked terrible, and I would be in favor of replacing him, but he didn't have any help from Samuels or Jansen. He had no pass protection all game.
However, the guy I blame the most for the loss is Gibbs. If Portis says he's healthy enough to play in a game against your arch-rival, you play him. Are you resting him so he'll be ready for Houston next week? Give me a break. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#88 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 395
|
Re: Brunell Solely Responsible for Loss?
It took Gibbs a little over a quarter of one game to decide to pull Ramsey. Lets see how long it takes to pull Brunell.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#89 |
Quietly Dominating the East
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Naples, Florida
Posts: 10,675
|
Re: Time to bench Brunell?
To those of you that think a quarterback change is a good thing, and will enhance our chances of SB apearance? Will improve the quality of play from the other 52 guys who sucked? Las Vegas was built using the money of people who thought like that and were willing to give it away so easlily. Brunell didn't lose the game. he sucked, but he had a lot of company. If we change, we can probably right off this year. it's to early to pull the trigger on a QB change. Put Todd in and.................what? There is a reason why he rides the pine. Put in JC....with our protection...........he becomes David Carr
__________________
Goodbye Sean..........Vaya Con Dios thankyou Joe....... “God made certain people to play football. He was one of them.” – Joe Gibbs |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#90 |
MVP
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 10,164
|
Re: Time to bench Brunell?
I have riden the Brunell band wagon for a while. Ever since Gibbs put in him in when Ramsey was "injured". But the excuses are really drying up here.
We don't throw donwfield. When you don't throw downfield then they can move Safeties and LBs up and or blitz them to create free pressure. Once this happens Brunell seems either a) happy to throw it away or b) unable to make a good throw. Now the reason we don't throw down field? A combo of bad pass protection and a CLEAR lack of confidence in Brunell's ability to do so. Either by himself or coaches. My reasons for considering Campbell. -At least he offers some athletic ability. He can maybe avoid pressure better. - He has a better arm and can clearly throw downfield. The guy has been around over a year. He understands football. I think the argument that it would be bad for him is over-rated. I am close to thinking it is really time for the Campbell era to begin. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|