Who will win the NFC East?

[D'BOYZ]

Man right Now I don't see any NFC team comming on top of Carolina or Chicago a lot of inconsistency. In the case off philly I don't see them surviving the second half of their schedule

[hooskins]

Originally Posted by D'BOYZ

Man right Now I don't see any NFC team comming on top of Carolina or Chicago a lot of inconsistency. In the case off philly I don't see them surviving the second half of their schedule

I agree, most people dont realize, Dallas shot themselves in the foot at Philly, and Philly really isnt not good. Yeah they kept up with the Saints, but that last drive the Saints put up was really embarassing, showed weakness in the Philly D. I still am not a believer of the Saints, havent played great teams(yeah I think ATL is not great, but good).

[D'BOYZ]

Originally Posted by hooskins

I agree, most people dont realize, Dallas shot themselves in the foot at Philly, and Philly really isnt not good. Yeah they kept up with the Saints, but that last drive the Saints put up was really embarassing, showed weakness in the Philly D. I still am not a believer of the Saints, havent played great teams(yeah I think ATL is not great, but good).

yeah just like Phi shot themselves in the foot against NY, I still belive the division is between NYG and Dallas and it will all come to this MNF to see which team is better.

But they aren't nowhere close Chicago and Carolina

[Giantone]

Ask me in December.

[Rexi]

I think Dallas will take it. I think once TO really gets going, the team will get that swagger and be on a roll going into the playoffs. I'm just unsure of Bledsoe right now, I really want to see what Romo start and see what he can do.

[jsarno]

Originally Posted by Rexi

I think Dallas will take it. I think once TO really gets going, the team will get that swagger and be on a roll going into the playoffs.

I believe that TO is nothing but a distraction and you will never see a team with TO on it win a super bowl.

[Rexi]

Originally Posted by jsarno

I believe that TO is nothing but a distraction and you will never see a team with TO on it win a super bowl.

Because that's what ESPN told you? If TO had been been healthy in 2004 I believe the Eagles would have won the SB. He can do some distracting things when they lose, but that's the kind of player he is. Take the bad parts with the good and recieve the best WR in the NFL.

[Meast]

Originally Posted by Rexi

Because that's what ESPN told you? If TO had been been healthy in 2004 I believe the Eagles would have won the SB. He can do some distracting things when they lose, but that's the kind of player he is. Take the bad parts with the good and recieve the best WR in the NFL.

Yeah, what is he? Eighteenth in the NFC now...http://www.nfl.com/stats/playersort/...ECEIVING/2006/ regular 30th in league?
Eat my ass Rexi, Terrell told me you were gay

Rexi appears to be at the forefront of a nascent trend of jocks saying they’re heterosexual. In 2000, Rexi, who lives with his mother and has a poodle, told a London paper that he's not gay. In 2002, Rexi held a press conference to deny that he’s gay, following a blind rumor in the daily San Franciscan . And in January, Rexi said he’s not gay, despite his appearance in a gay porn film.

True Shit

[Warpath]

I'll take Philly to win the East, The Bears to represent the NFC in the superbowl, and whoever goes for the AFC to win it all.