Saunders Quote in ESPN article

TheMalcolmConnection · 11-17-2006, 02:54 PM

Regardless, it won't be any different for Campbell. It's not like the backups are running a different system than Brunell was. He'll just have better playmakers to get the ball to.

SmootSmack · 11-17-2006, 03:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hooskins

And with a QB change, it might be even longer.

Well I mean I'm pretty excited about the change....but not that excited

724Skinsfan · 11-17-2006, 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TAFKAS

Well I mean I'm pretty excited about the change....but not that excited

Damn, TAFKAS! Wutsamattawichoo?

JGisLordOfTheRings · 11-17-2006, 03:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 724Skinsfan

Damn, TAFKAS! Wutsamattawichoo?

he's lookig at the BIG picture....if campbell could play THAT well, he woulda been playing already, right? logical concern but, with Gibbs' affinity for verterans it may prove otherwise....

HTTR!

SmootSmack · 11-17-2006, 03:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JGisLordOfTheRings

he's lookig at the BIG picture....if campbell could play THAT well, he woulda been playing already, right? logical concern but, with Gibbs' affinity for verterans it may prove otherwise....

HTTR!

Actually, it was a limp attempt at some lowbrow bathroom humor. Next time I'll try harder

hooskins · 11-17-2006, 03:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TAFKAS

Well I mean I'm pretty excited about the change....but not that excited

yeah I got the joke lol....

724Skinsfan · 11-17-2006, 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TAFKAS

Actually, it was a limp attempt at some lowbrow bathroom humor. Next time I'll try harder

Yeah, my attempt to acknowledge the humor was met with some stiff resistance.

hooskins · 11-17-2006, 03:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 724Skinsfan

Yeah, my attempt to acknowledge the humor was met with some stiff resistance.

hah stiff...loll

TheMalcolmConnection · 11-17-2006, 03:45 PM

More like flacid resistance.

SmootSmack · 11-17-2006, 03:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 724Skinsfan

Yeah, my attempt to acknowledge the humor was met with some stiff resistance.

If someone still didn't get the joke after 4 hours I was going to talk to an admin

724Skinsfan · 11-17-2006, 03:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMalcolmConnection

More like flacid resistance.

Not sure, you could be right. I wasn't paying THAT much attention.

EDIT: If anyone caught the original, it was not a freudian slip.

celts32 · 11-17-2006, 03:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BDBohnzie

It's certainly a long-term situation, setting everything up so when Gibbs steps asides, he knows he's got quality guys taking over. Same growing pains happened 2 years ago when Gibbs came back. It takes time for an offense to be implemented and click. I don't think the coaching staff thought it would take this long, and thought they had a playoff run in hand.

I wouldn't call this season a waste. It looks like Brunell could be led out to pasture after this season if Campbell does well. Saunders will get all gears going on this juggernaut. While it sucks now, long term is looking good.

The only problem with the LT plan is that Saunders is just as old as Gibbs.

hooskins · 11-17-2006, 03:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMalcolmConnection

More like flacid resistance.

hah flacid...loll

724Skinsfan · 11-17-2006, 03:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by celts32

The only problem with the LT plan is that Saunders is just as old as Gibbs.

He looks to be in great shape (running down the field with players) so as long as he's willing to call plays then age shouldn't be an issue.

Actually this may work to our benefit. The stress of being a head-coach is obviously greater than being an OC (or a DC). Saunders may decide that head-coaching is not in his future and decide to remain an OC. Why change jobs when your current job is paying like a head coach.

TheMalcolmConnection · 11-17-2006, 03:53 PM

Exactly. If I got paid the same as the director here and got to keep my current job, I'd love that shit.

11-17-2006, 02:54 PM	#31
TheMalcolmConnection I like big (_\|_)s. Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Charlottesville, Virginia Age: 44 Posts: 19,264	Re: Saunders Quote in ESPN article Regardless, it won't be any different for Campbell. It's not like the backups are running a different system than Brunell was. He'll just have better playmakers to get the ball to. __________________ Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.

11-17-2006, 03:45 PM	#39
TheMalcolmConnection I like big (_\|_)s. Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Charlottesville, Virginia Age: 44 Posts: 19,264	Re: Saunders Quote in ESPN article More like flacid resistance. __________________ Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.

11-17-2006, 03:53 PM	#45
TheMalcolmConnection I like big (_\|_)s. Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Charlottesville, Virginia Age: 44 Posts: 19,264	Re: Saunders Quote in ESPN article Exactly. If I got paid the same as the director here and got to keep my current job, I'd love that shit. __________________ Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.

Saunders Quote in ESPN article

Locker Room Main Forum