Betts or Portis debate (merged)

charlielyons · 12-03-2006, 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dall-assblows

i'll buy it

please explain why

Citizens for 81 · 12-03-2006, 05:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by charlielyons

please explain why

It doesn't have to be explained if you saw the games. He was the entire offense down the stretch.

charlielyons · 12-03-2006, 05:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Citizens for 81

It doesn't have to be explained if you saw the games. He was the entire offense down the stretch.

so i guess he was the one with 1500 rec yards and 23 passing tds.... and he returned the fumbles into the endzone and plays def.

Citizens for 81 · 12-03-2006, 05:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by charlielyons

so i guess he was the one with 1500 rec yards and 23 passing tds.... and he returned the fumbles into the endzone and plays def.

No he was the one with the redskin record of 1500+ yrd rushing.

charlielyons · 12-03-2006, 05:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Citizens for 81

No he was the one with the redskin record of 1500+ yrd rushing.

big deal , we would have won nothing without our solid def.

GTripp0012 · 12-03-2006, 05:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by charlielyons

big deal , we would have won nothing without our solid def.

True, but we would have just blamed Brunell for it.

Citizens for 81 · 12-03-2006, 05:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by charlielyons

big deal , we would have won nothing without our solid def.

The defense was solid all year. The difference down the stretch was Portis and the o-line's ability to grind it out and ice the games.

gabe1984 · 12-04-2006, 11:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by charlielyons

so i guess he was the one with 1500 rec yards and 23 passing tds.... and he returned the fumbles into the endzone and plays def.

do you seriously think we would of had 1500rec yards and 23 passing TDs without portis making defenses respect our running attack?

Locker Room Main Forum