Is Scott Pioli available after the season?

[MTK]

I wouldn't rule anything out with Gibbs. After all, he did give up control of the offense which is still pretty surprising when you think about it. If he thinks it would help, I'm sure he would consider it. That's the question though, does he see the current front office setup as a problem? Probably not.

[skinsguy]

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

I wouldn't rule anything out with Gibbs. After all, he did give up control of the offense which is still pretty surprising when you think about it. If he thinks it would help, I'm sure he would consider it. That's the question though, does he see the current front office setup as a problem? Probably not.

And he's probably kicking himself for it! But, at least he can show people that although his offense wasn't great and too conservatives (as what I heard over and over again last year) at least he's proved that it can work and probably would've worked just fine again this year with our current talent.

[hesscl34]

Originally Posted by skinsguy

And he's probably kicking himself for it! But, at least he can show people that although his offense wasn't great and too conservatives (as what I heard over and over again last year) at least he's proved that it can work and probably would've worked just fine again this year with our current talent.

My father used to scream at the tv while I was growing up "Why are you so conservative" when talking about Gibbs. It's his game. It's how he plays. He doens't take too many chances, but he's won 3 SBs, so he's doing something right.

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

I wouldn't rule anything out with Gibbs. After all, he did give up control of the offense which is still pretty surprising when you think about it. If he thinks it would help, I'm sure he would consider it. That's the question though, does he see the current front office setup as a problem? Probably not.

I think the difference though is this. Joe Gibbs has nothing to prove anymore as a coach. People know he can lead a team to greatness on the field. He's done it numerous times and has proven to be one of the best in history at that. So him ceding control of calling plays, yeah it's a big deal but then again it's not really. But the jury is still out (though most have already cast their ballots "No") on whether he can put together a great team, particularly one that someone else could lead down the road. Gibbs is a great, loyal man and all that but remember he's also a competitor. And I think the competitor in him wants to show that he can have the same success putting together a team as he does leading a team. I really don't see Gibbs going the way of Holmgren and saying "Ok, I'll just go back to coaching only."

[GhettoDogAllStars]

Originally Posted by TAFKAS

I think the difference though is this. Joe Gibbs has nothing to prove anymore as a coach. People know he can lead a team to greatness on the field. He's done it numerous times and has proven to be one of the best in history at that. So him ceding control of calling plays, yeah it's a big deal but then again it's not really. But the jury is still out (though most have already cast their ballots "No") on whether he can put together a great team, particularly one that someone else could lead down the road. Gibbs is a great, loyal man and all that but remember he's also a competitor. And I think the competitor in him wants to show that he can have the same success putting together a team as he does leading a team. I really don't see Gibbs going the way of Holmgren and saying "Ok, I'll just go back to coaching only."

Good post. I don't think Gibbs wants to have a boss.

[freddyg12]

Originally Posted by TAFKAS

I think the difference though is this. Joe Gibbs has nothing to prove anymore as a coach. People know he can lead a team to greatness on the field. He's done it numerous times and has proven to be one of the best in history at that. So him ceding control of calling plays, yeah it's a big deal but then again it's not really. But the jury is still out (though most have already cast their ballots "No") on whether he can put together a great team, particularly one that someone else could lead down the road. Gibbs is a great, loyal man and all that but remember he's also a competitor. And I think the competitor in him wants to show that he can have the same success putting together a team as he does leading a team. I really don't see Gibbs going the way of Holmgren and saying "Ok, I'll just go back to coaching only."

great post. I would agree but See T. Boswell's article from today's washpost, says Gibbs is open to hiring a gm.

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by freddyg12

great post. I would agree but See T. Boswell's article from today's washpost, says Gibbs is open to hiring a gm.

I have this feeling that it will be more a ceremonial title than anything else. I mean I think the decisions will still go through Gibbs