Sugar bowl fiasco...not right!

[itvnetop]

Originally Posted by jsarno

It is not right that a team gets to have another home game. LSU should not be playing Notre Dame at New Orleans, that's not right. Every game should be played at a neutral site.

bowl games are traditionally held at certain locations... teams are picked post-facto. would you move the rose bowl out of pasadena, even though USC goes there often?

notre dame is going to need more than their fans to pull this out... they look too slow for lsu.

[jsarno]

Originally Posted by itvnetop

bowl games are traditionally held at certain locations... teams are picked post-facto. would you move the rose bowl out of pasadena, even though USC goes there often?

notre dame is going to need more than their fans to pull this out... they look too slow for lsu.

I'm not saying move the Rose bowl out of pasedena, or the sugar bowl out of New Orleans, just that USC is not eligible for the Rose Bowl, or the LSU Tigers are not eligible for the Sugar Bowl. It's not fair to the opposing team.

They just scored a TD.

That QB (Russell) for LSU looks good...fast and BIG, with a good arm.

[itvnetop]

Originally Posted by jsarno

I'm not saying move the Rose bowl out of pasedena, or the sugar bowl out of New Orleans, just that USC is not eligible for the Rose Bowl, or the LSU Tigers are not eligible for the Sugar Bowl. It's not fair to the opposing team.

I like the fact that the Rose Bowl is the one game that kind of sticks against the BCS... it's always been a Pac 10/Big 10 matchup, except when the national champ contender is from either conference. Tradition trumps innovation in Pasadena.

Hey, ND looks like it's making a game of it... turnover by LSU.