![]() |
|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Mr. Brightside
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Leesburg, VA
Age: 39
Posts: 4,453
|
Re: John Clayton: Spotting some early free agency trends
briggs, justin smith, and samuel have all been tagged so thats 3 less big targets already. i wouldnt be dissapointed if we traded down to around 11 or so and got okoye if available.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: John Clayton: Spotting some early free agency trends
Quote:
We can't be looking to get rid of our pick. That leads to bad deals. If some team calls on draft day and wants to give us a lucrative deal for our pick, then you pull the trigger.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
MVP
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 10,164
|
Re: John Clayton: Spotting some early free agency trends
Quote:
I totally agree with the 'We can't be looking to get rid of our pick' mode of thinking. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Boone, NC
Posts: 579
|
Re: John Clayton: Spotting some early free agency trends
If we drop in the first round, should we still try to address the DL? It seems like there's a number of good defensive linemen this year. Or do you think we'll try to build the secondary should we trade down, since there's probably going to be a big DL push towards the beginning of the draft.
I think a guy like Reggie Nelson could be a great compliment to ST. I know Springs is probably going to get shifted to safety, so that still leaves us short a starting CB. Leon Hall could be around later in the 1st round or Darelle Revis. I just wonder what the Skins strategy will be should they slide in the order. I'd really like to draft a defensive linemen. I know a lot of you feel we should trade down if Alan Branch isn't available at 6, but what if Amobi Okoye is? I mean he's only 19, and he is a hoss. Gaines Adams or Jamal Anderson would most likely drop to the #6 if branch isn't taken. Shouldn't we snag one of those two? I don't think we'll be able to address our DL problems through FA. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 51
Posts: 5,311
|
Re: John Clayton: Spotting some early free agency trends
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: John Clayton: Spotting some early free agency trends
Quote:
I think they want Calvin Johnson.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 51
Posts: 5,311
|
Re: John Clayton: Spotting some early free agency trends
Quote:
As I see it, Oakland and Detroit will take quarterbacks. But Cleveland, Tampa Bay, and Arizona could go either way (offense or defense). If Branch is as awesome as people are saying -- a superstar at the defensive line is sometimes as lucrative to teams as franchise quarterbacks. Romeo Crennel is a defensive guy, and the Bucs always seem enamored with collecting players for a swarming defense, making that their primary focus -- they've always been known as a 'defense first' team. But hopefully Calvin Johnson will sway them the other way. Adrian Peterson is the other offensive gem that the Browns might not want to let get away. They need help everywhere. Like my sig says, I'm a Branch guy. Let's face it, when was the last time the Redskins had a cornerstone at defensive tackle? Branch could give us that for the first time since ... Dave Butz? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
You did WHAT?!?
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna.
Age: 36
Posts: 14,185
|
Re: John Clayton: Spotting some early free agency trends
we should stock with the defensive line regardless of where we draft from cause there is a plethera of talent in the d line in this years draft
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|