![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#61 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Should Dockery Be Re-signed Before Free Agency Starts (next Friday)
Resigning Pucillo could be an option. Theres plenty of starting caliber Guards every year who slip under the radar. Pucillo might be one, but there are probably a few more in FA.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
|
#62 |
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ellicott City, MD
Age: 42
Posts: 8,029
|
Re: Should Dockery Be Re-signed Before Free Agency Starts (next Friday)
I'd worry about how the rest of the team would feel if the FO can't get Dock to sign a new deal more than finding someone to take his place. Players have come out and publically said they want him back and if he leaves I'm afraid they might just say to themselves "there goes another guy that worked is butt off for the team with nothing to show for it" and not try as hard.
__________________
"Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man." The Dude |
|
|
|
|
|
#63 | |
|
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,846
|
Re: Should Dockery Be Re-signed Before Free Agency Starts (next Friday)
Quote:
Personally I'm not very concerned, he's just not going to command a top-flight lineman type of contact on the open market. If he wants to test the waters fine, go right ahead. Once he feels the lukewarm reception out there we'll have him right where we want him and he'll re-sign for a reasonable deal. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#64 | |
|
Swearinger
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
|
Re: Should Dockery Be Re-signed Before Free Agency Starts (next Friday)
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#65 |
|
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,846
|
Re: Should Dockery Be Re-signed Before Free Agency Starts (next Friday)
If worse comes to worse how about re-signing Wade and sticking him at LG?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#66 |
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ellicott City, MD
Age: 42
Posts: 8,029
|
Re: Should Dockery Be Re-signed Before Free Agency Starts (next Friday)
You are right about not just caving in and giving him whatever he wants. If we do that we run into the danger of having Carlos Rogers demand Champ Bailey money in a few years.
__________________
"Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man." The Dude |
|
|
|
|
|
#67 |
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ellicott City, MD
Age: 42
Posts: 8,029
|
Re: Should Dockery Be Re-signed Before Free Agency Starts (next Friday)
He seemed really tall the one game he played this past season. Can he pull?
__________________
"Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man." The Dude |
|
|
|
|
|
#68 |
|
Quietly Dominating the East
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Naples, Florida
Posts: 10,675
|
Re: Should Dockery Be Re-signed Before Free Agency Starts (next Friday)
As you say GM, we have paid to much for some FA's in the past. We can't continue to set and further reinforce that precedent. It completely kills our ability to deal with the other guys as their contracts come up. It also serves to undermine the attitude of the entire team if somebody gets far more that they are worth.
__________________
Goodbye Sean..........Vaya Con Dios thankyou Joe....... “God made certain people to play football. He was one of them.” – Joe Gibbs |
|
|
|
|
|
#69 |
|
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,846
|
Re: Should Dockery Be Re-signed Before Free Agency Starts (next Friday)
Wade is 6'8 but Dockery is no slouch either at 6'6.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#70 |
|
Swearinger
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
|
Re: Should Dockery Be Re-signed Before Free Agency Starts (next Friday)
Yeah, Wade does play tall from what little I've seen. You could always slide Pucillo over to guard. Fortunately Rabach is durable enough to give us that option. Also, this Taylor Whitley was a regular starter for the 'Phins in '04. And that Whitticker kid from Michigan started 14 games for the Packers in '05 and he is young. The roster review for Centers/Guards in on Redskins.com today too....
|
|
|
|
|
|
#71 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Should Dockery Be Re-signed Before Free Agency Starts (next Friday)
I'd rather see Pucillo at LG. Dude did a great job for us playing that TE position that we were paying Fauria to do.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
#72 |
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ellicott City, MD
Age: 42
Posts: 8,029
|
Re: Should Dockery Be Re-signed Before Free Agency Starts (next Friday)
Oh, I just thought of something! If we lose out on Dockery because another team outbids us by only a few thousand dollars we could have a QUESTION #4 situation on our hands!!!
__________________
"Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man." The Dude |
|
|
|
|
|
#73 | |
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 8,317
|
Re: Should Dockery Be Re-signed Before Free Agency Starts (next Friday)
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#74 |
|
I like big (_|_)s.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Age: 44
Posts: 19,264
|
Re: Should Dockery Be Re-signed Before Free Agency Starts (next Friday)
I'd also like to see him catch a pass or two just to throw people off guard.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted. |
|
|
|
|
|
#75 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Should Dockery Be Re-signed Before Free Agency Starts (next Friday)
Quote:
Actually this brings me back to a point I've been on for quite awhile now: We need a blocking-style TE bad. A guy who blocks like a lineman but can catch a pass every now and then also. Pucillo was fine, but theres only so many different plays you can call with him in the game at TE. Not to mention theres a chance he will be starting at G next year.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|