![]() |
|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 8,317
|
Re: Per NFL Network: Smoot Officially Released
Smoot is a DECENT coverage corner and I will be glad to get him back at the right price. My only concerns about him are (1) he's willing to try to stop the run, but it seems like he gets injured every time he makes a tackle on a RB and (2) he's not exactly the most effective blitzer. In most systems, such concerns wouldn't be that big of a deal, but GW asks his corners to do an awful lot.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
MVP
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 10,164
|
Re: Per NFL Network: Smoot Officially Released
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 8,317
|
Re: Per NFL Network: Smoot Officially Released
Good point. I definately noticed that we didn't see as many corner blitzes last year because our coverage was generally so bad.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Age: 37
Posts: 5,688
|
Re: Per NFL Network: Smoot Officially Released
Quote:
I won't mind if he doesn't blitz though, as long as he can somehow help sean taylor in the back field, I'll be happy. I feel the same way about smoot as I do about clark. They both are pretty good but they aren't going to make the pro bowl. They just fit our system. Smoot should have never left. Maybe I'm just hoping bringing back smoot will be a step in making this a GW defense again. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 51
Posts: 5,311
|
Re: Per NFL Network: Smoot Officially Released
I think it's pretty safe to say Clements isn't coming here -- not for what we'd be able to offer him.
Unless Smoot and Rogers suck out loud, worse than anyone could possibly imagine, we should be fine with them if we hit the jackpot on a dynamite defensive lineman with the #6 pick. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Germantown, Md.
Posts: 4,832
|
Re: Per NFL Network: Smoot Officially Released
Why is Smoot even available, is it his play (or lack thereof) or is it his partying? Smoot, like Clark loss their starting positions for the teams they left for, there must be a serious reason why the Vikings are releasing him. It does not appear we will land Nate Clements, but it does appear desperation has set in. "God forgive me for my sins"
__________________
A revolution is coming and it will be televised. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Impact Rookie
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 602
|
Re: Per NFL Network: Smoot Officially Released
the only things i remember of smoot are him talking in third person and his only interceptions i can think of were mostly off tipped balls not good coverage
__________________
give me food, feed me lunch 'you want water?', B#### give me punch - D12 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hagerstown, MD
Age: 43
Posts: 241
|
Re: Per NFL Network: Smoot Officially Released
Is Nick Harper still available?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hagerstown, MD
Age: 43
Posts: 241
|
Re: Per NFL Network: Smoot Officially Released
Here's another link to him being released The Minnesota Vikings - News Detail Once again is Nick Harper still available???? I feel ill thinking smoot will be our # 1 corner, I'm going to pray they sign clements some how!!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 49
Posts: 4,261
|
Re: Per NFL Network: Smoot Officially Released
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Per NFL Network: Smoot Officially Released
Quote:
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 49
Posts: 4,261
|
Re: Per NFL Network: Smoot Officially Released
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|