Rethinking Briggs

[GTripp0012]

Originally Posted by omeletpants

But lets say the Bear's took the deal then traded down 5-6 places and pick up an extra 4th rounder and take Patrick Willis to replace Briggs. So, it's Briggs and the 31st pick for Willis and a 4th rounder. That's a horrible trade for the Bears

Trading down 5-6 places from No. 6 would net the Bears at least a 2nd rounder, and probably a 4th in addition.

But I think your analysis still stands. A 2nd plus a 4th and Willis for Briggs and the 31st? It's hard to see the Bears coming out on top on this trade. Willis could be every bit as good as Briggs and could move into the middle once Urlacher hangs it up, but as far as the next season or two goes, the Bears would be starting a very inexperienced player at LB and you have to wonder if this may force Hunter Hillenmeyer to take an increase responsibility in the defense that he doesn't have the skill to fill.

I honestly think the Bears play this one slow and get Briggs to sign his franchise tender by agreeing to not use the tag on him next year. Briggs has no leverage in this. He simply can't afford to sit out ten games because if he does, he may never get the pay day he's looking at.

[omeletpants]

Originally Posted by GTripp0012

I honestly think the Bears play this one slow and get Briggs to sign his franchise tender by agreeing to not use the tag on him next year. Briggs has no leverage in this. He simply can't afford to sit out ten games because if he does, he may never get the pay day he's looking at.

You are right on target. Everyone in Chicago is panicing saying he will sit out the season. No player in the history of the Franchise Tag has ever missed a season or even one game. If anyone thinks Briggs is sitting out 10 games and losing $4.5M they are crazy. He can't tank it because he is looking for a massive payout. The funny thing is that on radio interviews he has said he would come back for a big contract. Draft choices are great, but give me a 2 time pro-bowl player that's 26 with no injury history

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by omeletpants

You are right on target. Everyone in Chicago is panicing saying he will sit out the season. No player in the history of the Franchise Tag has ever missed a season or even one game. If anyone thinks Briggs is sitting out 10 games and losing $4.5M they are crazy. He can't tank it because he is looking for a massive payout. The funny thing is that on radio interviews he has said he would come back for a big contract. Draft choices are great, but give me a 2 time pro-bowl player that's 26 with no injury history

I know he didn't have the "Franchise Tag" per se, but I still remember when Bears Safety Todd Bell sat out an entire season because of a contract dispute with the team.

Love the username