![]() |
|
Parking Lot Off-topic chatter pertaining to movies, TV, music, video games, etc. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
MVP
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 63
Posts: 10,672
|
Re: Time for a flat tax
hate to say it, but you should pay more if you make more. why should i be paying the same flat tax as a millionaire? if you think about it, it really doesn't make sense
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt." courtesy of 53fan |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 31 Spooner St.
Age: 50
Posts: 9,534
|
Re: Time for a flat tax
Quote:
You really have your work cut out for you to explain why a millionaire deserves a higher percentage TAKEN from them to support the poor. ps- I am not even referring to millionaires...but people that make say 100k instead of people that make say 30k. But millionaires still count in my flat tax idea.
__________________
Zoltan is ZESTY! - courtesy of joeredskin |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 8,317
|
Re: Time for a flat tax
But they do pay more. As it stands right now, the richest 1% of the country pays over 35% of all income taxes.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
A Dude
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 46
Posts: 12,458
|
Re: Time for a flat tax
Quote:
I know we here at the Warpath like to argue what "should" be the case on a lot of issues, but so often (as with the salary cap) we forget to ground ourselves in what is possible. We need to tax the rich a greater % than we tax the middle class and the poor, because the nation needs that money. If we went with a flat tax that managed to net the same amount of overall revenue that our current graduated system does, the flat tax rate would represent an absolutely CRIPPLING tax hike for the poor and the middle class. Maybe that seems "fair" to you, but I don't see how that can be considered a good thing when so many middle class people are struggling to afford health insurance as it is. With college education costs rising so fast and with the recent run-up in home prices, the middle class is getting squeezed enough as it is. A flat tax would thrust many of them into poverty so the top 1% could buy more yachts. I'm a red-blooded Republican, and I still recognize a flat tax makes no sense. The middle class does indeed need to realize that they need to work hard and pull themselves up, and not depend on the government. But the shift of money from the poor to the rich would be huge if we moved to a flat tax. Besides, this idea would NEVER pass in congress. The likelihood of this ever happening is so remote that it almost renders this thread "retarded." But please, let's all continue arguing based on ideals instead of reality, and continue to pretend a flat tax would be more fair in our ideal worlds.
__________________
God made certain people to play football. He was one of them. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
MVP
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 10,164
|
Re: Time for a flat tax
Quote:
All that being said I am not sure a flat tax would work for us and I am relatively ok with our progressive system as long as politicians keep an eye out for middle America. It is requiring increasingly more money to live comfortably in this country and that is driving up salaries. All of a sudden a lot of people who are considered in the higher tax bracket are the same ones who'd have been no higher than middle-middle class 40 years ago adjusted for inflation. They might have only been in the second tax bracket then. Take the AMT for example. A lot, no a TON of people are going to get hit with this in the coming few years and it will mostly be middle class Americans who all of a sudden are getting bumped into the same tax bracket Bill Gates and Warren Buffett are in. The AMT was meant for the super rich when it was made. Does that even make any sense at all? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|