05-03-2007, 03:49 PM
|
#11
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,439
|
Re: Santana vs. Randy
Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012
I think it's clear that the boards opinion of a No. 1 receiver and your opinion are whats causing this disagreement.
To me and many others, a No. 1 WR simply means a guy who can be relied on at any point in the game and can do his job well.
To you, a No. 1 WR is one of the rarest and most elite players in the game. Guys like Boldin, Fitzgerald, Roy Willams, and Andre Johnson didn't make your list.
It's just semantics. I would argue that Santana is possibly the second most valuable receiver in the NFL (S. Smith)...but I would be undervaluing some veteran skills in Wayne, Harrison, Chad Johnson, and Holt.
Our perceptions of what a No. 1 receiver needs to be is the only argument here.
|
Moss is our #1. No question about that. But compared to the elite #1's I don't think he is in that class of wr. The guys you mentioned are right on the edge.
|
|
|