Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Here we go again with Briggs

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-17-2007, 09:05 AM   #1
dmek25
MVP
 
dmek25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 63
Posts: 10,672
Re: Here we go again with Briggs

i cant believe that people would actually be pissed if the skins brought in a pro bowl player. sure, i think the price is too high, but i can also think of alot worse players to bring in. and any player that can make plays on defense is welcome
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt."
courtesy of 53fan
dmek25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2007, 09:06 AM   #2
EARTHQUAKE2689
You did WHAT?!?
 
EARTHQUAKE2689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna.
Age: 36
Posts: 14,185
Re: Here we go again with Briggs

Quote:
Originally Posted by dmek25 View Post
i cant believe that people would actually be pissed if the skins brought in a pro bowl player. sure, i think the price is too high, but i can also think of alot worse players to bring in. and any player that can make plays on defense is welcome

when you put it that way it's not that i dont want briggs i am just skeptical
__________________
https://open.spotify.com/artist/1NG9zNxqMP8cYNP72QqUQT

Shameless self-promotion. It is what it is.
EARTHQUAKE2689 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.39419 seconds with 11 queries