Rank our OLine among the 32 teams

[BigSKINBauer]

Originally Posted by GTripp0012

I would think, although I'm not sure on this, that the biggest factor into how effective an offense is is how good it's line is. Unless you have unimpressive skill position players, and the Redskins certainly don't, I wouldn't rank a line above where I would rank their overall offense.

I'll disclose the theory I'm writing on later.

Very interesting way of looking at it. I like the way it sounds because I have always felt that both sides, offense and defense, starts at the line. I still feel the team builds on the line but i would look at it as a team is only as good as its o-line rather than an o-line is only as good as its team it is on.

I do agree that we don't have a bad offense outside of the o-line so it is not like our qb's wrs rbs, ect are pulling down our offense. However, it is interesting- i don't think one team i named in the top 7 is top 10 in overall offense. Very int-er-est-ing....hmmm

Moreover, I still feel the fact that we weren't top ten in offense is not to say we we didn't(w/ dockery) have a top ten o line. I think it brings up more questions about the functionality of our offense under Saunder more than anything else. Though it was just the first year of the system.