Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Just plain ugly

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-09-2007, 11:39 PM   #1
jsarno
Franchise Player
 
jsarno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 31 Spooner St.
Age: 50
Posts: 9,534
Re: Just plain ugly

Quote:
Originally Posted by love them hogs View Post
Rule three , section thirtey

A shift is the action of two or more offensive players who (prior to a snap), After having assumed a set position, simultaneously change the position of thier feet by pivoting to or assuming a new set position with either one foot or both feet.

Its all right there.
No it's not...read it again..."change the position of their feet", not move from their set position to another position on the other side of the field. So they are in the same relative area, but went into a 3 point stance, or shifted slightly to the left or something of that nature.
It does not say anything about running to a new position.
And that seems like it would be a false start to me.
__________________
Zoltan is ZESTY! - courtesy of joeredskin
jsarno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2007, 08:52 PM   #2
love them hogs
Special Teams
 
love them hogs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Baltimore for now
Age: 46
Posts: 235
Re: Just plain ugly

Quote:
Originally Posted by jsarno View Post
No it's not...read it again..."change the position of their feet", not move from their set position to another position on the other side of the field. So they are in the same relative area, but went into a 3 point stance, or shifted slightly to the left or something of that nature.
It does not say anything about running to a new position.
And that seems like it would be a false start to me.
Dids you even read this rule completly or can you not understand what it is saying?(not sarcastic, just curious)Lets try again .A SHIFT is when two or more players move PRIOR to the snap AFTER they have set,and assume a new position.Your whole argument is that two players cant move after they have been set and this is clearly wrong. If you put your ego aside and actually read the rules you would see what im saying.If the refs say that yoder and sellars moved to abruptly then i can see that.However to say that two players cant move after they have been set is just plain wrong.

A player is only considered in MOTION if he is moving when the ball is snapped.If he stops moving and resets himself for one second then it is a SHIFT.Those are two different things.Yesterday you said I was focusing on the word snap to much,but it would seem you are not focusing on it enough.The word snap is in that sentence of the rule for a reason.

Anyways, Im sure you are just going to keep on believing what you want and thats fine.Gibbs and I will continue to think otherwise.
love them hogs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2007, 09:55 PM   #3
Sheriff Gonna Getcha
Franchise Player
 
Sheriff Gonna Getcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 8,317
Re: Just plain ugly

Quote:
Originally Posted by love them hogs View Post
Dids you even read this rule completly or can you not understand what it is saying?(not sarcastic, just curious)Lets try again .A SHIFT is when two or more players move PRIOR to the snap AFTER they have set,and assume a new position.Your whole argument is that two players cant move after they have been set and this is clearly wrong. If you put your ego aside and actually read the rules you would see what im saying.If the refs say that yoder and sellars moved to abruptly then i can see that.However to say that two players cant move after they have been set is just plain wrong.

A player is only considered in MOTION if he is moving when the ball is snapped.If he stops moving and resets himself for one second then it is a SHIFT.Those are two different things.Yesterday you said I was focusing on the word snap to much,but it would seem you are not focusing on it enough.The word snap is in that sentence of the rule for a reason.

Anyways, Im sure you are just going to keep on believing what you want and thats fine.Gibbs and I will continue to think otherwise.
I should have read your post before I just posted. You captured exactly what I wanted, but failed, to say.
Sheriff Gonna Getcha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2007, 12:23 AM   #4
jsarno
Franchise Player
 
jsarno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 31 Spooner St.
Age: 50
Posts: 9,534
Re: Just plain ugly

Quote:
Originally Posted by love them hogs View Post
Dids you even read this rule completly or can you not understand what it is saying?(not sarcastic, just curious)Lets try again .A SHIFT is when two or more players move PRIOR to the snap AFTER they have set,and assume a new position.Your whole argument is that two players cant move after they have been set and this is clearly wrong. If you put your ego aside and actually read the rules you would see what im saying.If the refs say that yoder and sellars moved to abruptly then i can see that.However to say that two players cant move after they have been set is just plain wrong.

A player is only considered in MOTION if he is moving when the ball is snapped.If he stops moving and resets himself for one second then it is a SHIFT.Those are two different things.Yesterday you said I was focusing on the word snap to much,but it would seem you are not focusing on it enough.The word snap is in that sentence of the rule for a reason.
I understand what you're saying, I think I misunderstood you before.
__________________
Zoltan is ZESTY! - courtesy of joeredskin
jsarno is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.00218 seconds with 11 queries