![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
MVP
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 46
Posts: 10,069
|
Re: Trading #85
This has got to be a joke. No way they trade Chad Johnson and if they do it'll be for at least 2 first round picks not for some scrubs.
__________________
"The Redskins have always suffered from chronic organizational deformities under Snyder." -Jenkins |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Washington DC area
Posts: 215
|
Re: Trading #85
WHAT! 2 first round picks, who is this Ocho Cinco you speak of? He is a good player, no doubt, but no reciever would be traded for 2 first round picks.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 224
|
Re: Trading #85
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
|
Re: Trading #85
Quote:
I think it's just a result of teams learning how to work w/in the cap & free agency as the system's gotten older. Also, in the cap era there are really only 2 main reasons to trade a guy: 1) he's at the end of his deal & you don't plan to re-sign him 2) he's a problem Of course you can always say you want picks to get younger, etc. but even then the cap hit has to make sense since trades escalate bonus $. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
MVP
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 46
Posts: 10,069
|
Re: Trading #85
Quote:
What did you guys pay for Joey Galloway a few years back? And that's Joey Galloway! Chad Johnson is worth 2 first round picks that or at least a quality player and a first round pick.
__________________
"The Redskins have always suffered from chronic organizational deformities under Snyder." -Jenkins |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Washington DC area
Posts: 215
|
Re: Trading #85
Sorry, I meant to say "no receiver SHOULD be traded for 2 first round picks". Galloway was a great receiver and he is still good, Dallas could not get a hold of a good QB.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 293
|
Re: Trading #85
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 1,555
|
Re: Trading #85
Quote:
P.S. Remember the good old days when we got two first for Sean Gilbert?
__________________
It has taken a long time, but I have finally realized that nothing I say about the Redskins will have any effect upon anything the Redskins do. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Special Teams
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Washington DC area
Posts: 215
|
Re: Trading #85
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
No new threads for you
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: On the boder line of hard times
Posts: 186
|
Re: Trading #85
Quote:
didnt they get rid of the best WR in the NFL now, for a 4th round pick...(Raiders) no way it cost 2 first rounders.......please, when the organization and coach say the consider, its the best offer.......not what they want, but the best they can get...
__________________
IN MADDEN 08 IM THE MASTER AND THE RULER OF THE WORLD |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Denver
Age: 43
Posts: 2,762
|
Re: Trading #85
Quote:
Also, Moss was largely considered to be past his prime, plus a malcontent, and a lot of his success was credited to working with Culpepper and Carter. Obviously that's not the case, but perception is everything.
__________________
To succeed in the world it is not enough to be stupid, you must also be well-mannered. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
No new threads for you
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: On the boder line of hard times
Posts: 186
|
Re: Trading #85
Quote:
is that what i said.....read, I said they will take the best offer, which mean, no they want give him away, but if someone offers up a 2nd or 3rd with another player or a 2nd and 3rd, then yea.........maybe a low 1st, but not 2 1st rounders......thats what i said!!!!!!
__________________
IN MADDEN 08 IM THE MASTER AND THE RULER OF THE WORLD |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Denver
Age: 43
Posts: 2,762
|
Re: Trading #85
Quote:
You obviously don't think any team would give up 2 first rounders for him, and neither do I. However, stranger things have happened. Keep in mind that both 1st rounders would not likely be in the same year. One would be next draft, and the other would be the draft after that. Generally, a pick in next years draft is worth the same as a pick one round lower in this years draft. So, a 1st next year is worth a 2nd this year. If you think about it that way, you might say it would only be a 1st and 2nd -- not two firsts. But, you'd probably just be kidding yourself. ![]()
__________________
To succeed in the world it is not enough to be stupid, you must also be well-mannered. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Annapolis, MD
Posts: 149
|
Re: Trading #85
I also heard about Ocho Cinco being dealt away, I think it was on either Rotoworld.com or Profootballtalk.com
Chad Johnson : Rotoworld.com - Chad Johnson Biography from Rotoworld.com read the days of 10/23 and 10/22
__________________
Section 102, Row 12... now I finally need to get a hold of one of those motorized coolers.. http://www.cruzincooler.com/ RIP#21 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
|
Re: Trading #85
Gibbs likely wouldn't want him, especially w/a young qb just starting to come into his own.
I bet JJ makes a play for him on the Cowpokes. They will look at it as the "final piece." |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|