Coach Gibbs might consider extending stay.

[Beemnseven]

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

So all you can point out is 6 success stories in 4 years?

How does the possibility of a 30-34 record over four seasons translate into "success" ?

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by Beemnseven

How does the possibility of a 30-34 record over four seasons translate into "success" ?

Because the original point of this mini-discussion here started when you disputed RajMahal's point that Gibbs has done a good job of finding and developing youth. So really the past four years isn't the true indicator of success in this case.

It's about the potential success we we have ahead of us with guys like Campbell, Moss, Portis, Cooley, Heyer, Alexander, Landry, Rocky, Rogers, Montgomery, Golston, Doughty, Blades (among others) leading the way.

[Beemnseven]

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

Because the original point of this mini-discussion here started when you disputed RajMahal's point that Gibbs has done a good job of finding and developing youth. So really the past four years isn't the true indicator of success in this case.

It's about the potential success we we have ahead of us with guys like Campbell, Moss, Portis, Cooley, Heyer, Alexander, Landry, Rocky, Rogers, Montgomery, Golston, Doughty, Blades (among others) leading the way.

So your overall record isn't a good indicator of your success? The players you acquire have no impact on those records?

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by Beemnseven

So your overall record isn't a good indicator of your success? The players you acquire have no impact on those records?

I guess you didn't understand my post. That's ok.

[MTK]

Originally Posted by Beemnseven

How does the possibility of a 30-34 record over four seasons translate into "success" ?

I'm talking about individual players that we can either deem a good player (success) or bad player (failure). I'm looking at personnel only, I'm not talking about records.