Are the Changes really an improvement???

[SouperMeister]

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

Well how do you know he didn't give Gibbs' guidance any credence?

Why would Gibbs have asked Williams to remain in the hunt last week when Williams was ready to pull out when Fassel emerged as the leading candidate? That to me says that Gibbs advised Snyder that his first choice to succeed him was Williams. That's not just reading between the lines, that's commons sense.

[skinsfaninok]

I do think zorn's offense will help JC more, its similar to what he ran at Auburn so thats a good thing for JC. I don't think he was ever gonna be a "STAR" in the saunders system. As for Fassel not fossil he has a winning record and has gone to a SB with kerry collins!!!

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by SouperMeister

Why would Gibbs have asked Williams to remain in the hunt last week when Williams was ready to pull out when Fassel emerged as the leading candidate? That to me says that Gibbs advised Snyder that his first choice to succeed him was Williams. That's not just reading between the lines, that's commons sense.

Yeah I agree that Gibbs apparently wanted Williams to succeed him, and that obviously isn't happening now. But I don't think it's fair to any of the parties involved to assume that's all Gibbs suggested.

For all we know, he also said:

-Someone needs to succeed Williams and I think Blache deserves it
-Olivadotti's contract is up. The players like him, let's make sure he gets an extension
-Scott Campbell has done a really good job scouting college players the last few years. He should be promoted

And so on. Incidentally, all of the above speaks to "continuity" I mean, I'm not saying this is what happened necessarily. But I don't think we should limit the whole conversation to what happened with Williams.