![]() |
|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: How about Bryant Johnson?
I'm torn on him. He's a really good #3 receiver, but does he have the consistency to be a #1/#2?
I'm not saying he's a bust, because he's not. But there's a perception that he was some unheralded late pick who worked his way into the rotation with Boldin and Fitzgerald. But that's not the case. He was a top 20 pick who's firmly entrenched as the 3rd receiver behind Fitz and Boldin. I guess my question would be why isn't he really seen as more than a #3 WR? I wouldn't hate having him here, just torn on whether he should be a priority.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: San Diego Ca
Posts: 5,349
|
Re: How about Bryant Johnson?
Quote:
As long as he doesn't expect bolden or fitzgerald money, There is no reason not to get him. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: How about Bryant Johnson?
But that's sort of my point. I mean I know Fitz was like a top 3 pick, but Boldin was a late 2nd (early 3rd?) round pick. And I'm not putting Boldin down by any means. I think he's awesome. All I'm saying is Johnson was pretty highly regarded coming out of college and drafted accordingly so is the reason he's #3 because he's behind Fitz and Boldin, or is it because he's underachieved and doesn't have the consistency to be any better?
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ridgway, PA
Age: 46
Posts: 2,519
|
Re: How about Bryant Johnson?
Quote:
FILLING IN FOR BOLDIN: WK4 vs. PITT 4rec. 40yds. 0TD's WK5 @ STL 6rec. 80yds. 0TD's WK6 vs. CAR 4rec. 29yds. 0TD's WK14 @ SEA 1rec. 5yds. 1TD FILLING IN FOR FITZGERALD: WK13 vs. CLE 6rec. 56yds. 1TD And you can look up on NFL.COM for the rest of last season stats for Johnson , but the question remains... Is he a good WR stuck behind 2 pro-bowlers, or is he nothing more than an average 3rd WR?
__________________
"I am the best at what I do, and what I do isn't very nice" - Sean Taylor |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
A Dude
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 46
Posts: 12,458
|
Re: How about Bryant Johnson?
Quote:
Those 5 games extrapolated to a 16-game season, making the assumption he'd start for 16 games, that would translate into: 67 Catches, 672 Yards, 6.4 TDs (as the #2 WR on the team, after all, either Boldin or Fitz were on the field the whole time opposite Johnson). That's a nice possession receiver and a big RZ target, given that Moss would still be your #1 and Randle-El would look real nice in the slot. And you'd end up paying Johnson like the #3 WR on our team (he'd make less than Moss & ARE). Seems like the perfect thing for our WCO. Anyone who thinks we're going to magically acquire a WR not named Chad Johnson or Randy Moss, and who will put up over 1000 yards for us is delusional. Bryant Johnson would fit in real well, especially for the money. I think DJ Hackett is capable of very similar production and is probably a better fit given familiarity with Zorn. But Johnson is exactly the kind of guy we need.
__________________
God made certain people to play football. He was one of them. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,836
|
Re: How about Bryant Johnson?
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|