Shaun Alexander released by Seahawks

[MTK]

Consider him for what?

Ball boy?

[SFREDSKIN]

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

Consider him for what?

Ball boy?

Due to the coaching link (Zorn, Stump Mitchell). Capish?

[Monksdown]

I think what Matty's trying to say is that we don't need a running back. Let alone a wimpy old running back.

[MTK]

Originally Posted by SFREDSKIN

Due to the coaching link (Zorn, Stump Mitchell). Capish?

Makes no sense to pick up a back who's clearly over the hill and when we have absolutely no need for another back.

What are you going to do stick him in front of Betts??

[SFREDSKIN]

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

Makes no sense to pick up a back who's clearly over the hill and when we have absolutely no need for another back.

What are you going to do stick him in front of Betts??

I don't want him. What I'm saying is would the skins FO consider him due to the Seattle connection. After all it is the Danny and Vinnie show and they just might pull some bone head move and trade Betts and sign Alexander. Oh and by the way, he's 30 YO.

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by SFREDSKIN

I don't want him. What I'm saying is would the skins FO consider him due to the Seattle connection. After all it is the Danny and Vinnie show and they just might pull some bone head move and trade Betts and sign Alexander. Oh and by the way, he's 30 YO.

Dumb, dumb, dumb post. Deserves negative rep points.

[MTK]

Originally Posted by SFREDSKIN

I don't want him. What I'm saying is would the skins FO consider him due to the Seattle connection. After all it is the Danny and Vinnie show and they just might pull some bone head move and trade Betts and sign Alexander. Oh and by the way, he's 30 YO.

Using that logic I guess we'll consider any ex-Seahawk due to Zorn?

[jsarno]

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

Consider him for what?

Ball boy?

Bingo! You win the prize.
Alexander is useless, we shouldn't take him even for the vet min.