Forcefeeding

[offiss]

Originally Posted by illdefined

if you think Gibbs would put pride or money in front of wins and give Brunell the ball just cuz he was his choice at expense of the team, you are just dead wrong.

, not to mention the most talented on that side of the ball. by far. he was being used completely wrong at first, but he gave it his all, and once Gibbs learned how to use him, the fumbles stopped and the yardage came. that guy NEVER quits, and is always squirming for that yard way after the OLine, Brunell, AND the WRs have given up on the play. i noticed Gibbs held back on the pitchouts this game, too bad, i saw that his longest gain was on one of the rare times they called it.

Correct me if I am wrong here Portis has 2 100yd games? Gardner has been our best offensive player this year.

Im dead wrong AAAAA, so tell me what has Brunell done to earn the loyalty he is recieving right now? Any other QB for any other team would be on the bench, but Brunell is still playing, and all the NFL experts no it! Gibb's made a pre-determained decision on the QB's without really taking a close look at Ramsey, he assumed that Brunell because of his previous numbers would thrive under his guidance, well we are seeing why Coughlin wanted to trade him, he knew he couldn't win with him, he was a kaotic QB who ran around and made play's, he is not a passer which you have to be to play for Gibb's, so keep writing because when ramsey get's his chance to play I will season them with salt and post them so you may eat them.

Rest assured I AM DEAD ON!!!!!

QUOTE]slack?? anyone who's dissed Portis this year is nuts. Portis has been the ONLY guy on our offense this whole year

Maybe that explain's our 2-5 record? :tongue

[illdefined]

Originally Posted by offiss

Correct me if I am wrong here Portis has 2 100yd games? Gardner has been our best offensive player this year.

Im dead wrong AAAAA, so tell me what has Brunell done to earn the loyalty he is recieving right now? Any other QB for any other team would be on the bench, but Brunell is still playing, and all the NFL experts no it! Gibb's made a pre-determained decision on the QB's without really taking a close look at Ramsey, he assumed that Brunell because of his previous numbers would thrive under his guidance, well we are seeing why Coughlin wanted to trade him, he knew he couldn't win with him, he was a kaotic QB who ran around and made play's, he is not a passer which you have to be to play for Gibb's, so keep writing because when ramsey get's his chance to play I will season them with salt and post them so you may eat them.

Rest assured I AM DEAD ON!!!!!

Maybe that explain's our 2-5 record? :tongue

sure thing offiss, and PRESEASON didn't happen. what happened to Ramsey then?? have you seen what he's like at practice?

oh and Gardner's 'awesome' play this year is just a liiiittle bit determined by the play of your boy uh...BRUNELL

oh and just because i said Portis is the most talented player on an 11 man offense we should have a record of 7-0 and seven 100 yd games??

[offiss]

Originally Posted by illdefined

sure thing offiss, and PRESEASON didn't happen. what happened to Ramsey then?? have you seen what he's like at practice?

oh and Gardner's 'awesome' play this year is just a liiiittle bit determined by the play of your boy uh...BRUNELL

oh and just because i said Portis is the most talented player on an 11 man offense we should have a record of 7-0 and seven 100 yd games??

What on earth did Brunell do in the pre-season that remotly said this guy is the good's, he's a veteran QB playing against scrub's and didn't look any better than Ramsey other than 1 TD to McCant's that's it, the starting job apparently from what we knew was still up for grab's 4 games into the pre-season, and don't think that the deck wasen't stacked in Brunell's favor as far as matchup's either, he stunk in the pre season he was just anointed starter ahead of Ramsey a young and still inexpierenced QB, most of this board agreed Ramsey would have had to out play Brunell big time to start.

As far as practice goes I imagine he's doing better there, I heard Jeff George was a pretty good practice player.

As far as Portis goes, YOU SAID that Portis is the only guy on our offense this year, meaning he's our entire offense, then you said he is also our most talented player, so I was correct in what I read, you were incorrect in understanding what you wrote.

You do have a point though about Brunell contributing to Gardner's success, if it wasen't for his eratic passing Gardner wouldn't have had the opportunity to make oh about 5 or 6 catches this year that probably most NFL reciever's would be lucky to catch 1, that is why he is our MVP on offense right now, Now if Portis is not more talented than Gardner I would hate to be the one who has to pay Gardner next year, or Portis for the remainder of his contract, you see talent and production are 2 totally different scenerio's.

It's only a matter of time rest assured there will be grumbling's behind the seen's from player's about the horrific play of Brunell, and Gibb's will have no choice but to play Ramsey, IT IS ONLY A MATTER OF TIME!

[illdefined]

Originally Posted by offiss

What on earth did Brunell do in the pre-season that remotly said this guy is the good's, he's a veteran QB playing against scrub's and didn't look any better than Ramsey other than 1 TD to McCant's that's it, the starting job apparently from what we knew was still up for grab's 4 games into the pre-season, and don't think that the deck wasen't stacked in Brunell's favor as far as matchup's either, he stunk in the pre season he was just anointed starter ahead of Ramsey a young and still inexpierenced QB, most of this board agreed Ramsey would have had to out play Brunell big time to start.

point is, Ramsey didn't outplay Brunell. Gibbs did take a serious look.

Originally Posted by offiss

As far as Portis goes, YOU SAID that Portis is the only guy on our offense this year, meaning he's our entire offense, then you said he is also our most talented player, so I was correct in what I read, you were incorrect in understanding what you wrote.

You do have a point though about Brunell contributing to Gardner's success, if it wasen't for his eratic passing Gardner wouldn't have had the opportunity to make oh about 5 or 6 catches this year that probably most NFL reciever's would be lucky to catch 1, that is why he is our MVP on offense right now, Now if Portis is not more talented than Gardner I would hate to be the one who has to pay Gardner next year, or Portis for the remainder of his contract, you see talent and production are 2 totally different scenerio's.

ANY wide receiver's play is heavily dependent on QB play, whose play is determined by OLine play. YOU started off by saying you were giving Portis 'slack', when in the face of every defense stacking up the line, he's been productive IN SPITE of the Oline and QB play. and i dunno what you're talking about contracts now?

Originally Posted by offiss

It's only a matter of time rest assured there will be grumbling's behind the seen's from player's about the horrific play of Brunell, and Gibb's will have no choice but to play Ramsey, IT IS ONLY A MATTER OF TIME!

of COURSE it's a matter of time Ramsey will play, Ramsey is our QB of the future, as said by Gibbs himself. but he will only good be after he's learned a couple more things on the field, and our oLine improves.

[offiss]

Originally Posted by illdefined

point is, Ramsey didn't outplay Brunell. Gibbs did take a serious look.



ANY wide receiver's play is heavily dependent on QB play, whose play is determined by OLine play. YOU started off by saying you were giving Portis 'slack', when in the face of every defense stacking up the line, he's been productive IN SPITE of the Oline and QB play. and i dunno what you're talking about contracts now?



of COURSE it's a matter of time Ramsey will play, Ramsey is our QB of the future, as said by Gibbs himself. but he will only good be after he's learned a couple more things on the field, and our oLine improves.

I was talking about contract's in a comparative fashion, because you essentially said that because Portis is our most talented player that he is our most productive player which is just not true, we all know Portis is our most talented player, but Gardner has outplayed him, if Gardner was a more talented player he would be impossible to sign because we would have to pay him like Portis, this wasen't a debate over who has more talent, it was a debate over who has been more productive, I never thought I would say it but I don't see any way we could vote for anyone on offense MVP right now other than Gardner, and I think it's hand's down.

And no I wouldn't consider Portis productive right now, if you measure production on average you will find he is below average, and if you measure production by contract then he's a bust right now, let's face it you said a lot of a WR's success is due to the QB, well so is the RB's, the sooner we get Brunell out of there the sooner player's will start filling their potential.

There are to many on this board who want to hold Ramsey to a higher accountability than Brunell, that's just not fair, Brunell was the guy brought here to step right in and be productive because of his experience, and here we are grooming a 34 year old over the hill QB with a lot of recent injury problem's, many want to bring up rookies like B. Roth and compare Ramsey to him, well how bout comparing a seasoned veteran to BR? It's obvious Brunell isn't capable of outplaying a rookie! Brunell is obviously not who Gibb's felt he would be. peace out!

[illdefined]

Originally Posted by offiss

I was talking about contract's in a comparative fashion, because you essentially said that because Portis is our most talented player that he is our most productive player which is just not true, we all know Portis is our most talented player, but Gardner has outplayed him, if Gardner was a more talented player he would be impossible to sign because we would have to pay him like Portis, this wasen't a debate over who has more talent, it was a debate over who has been more productive, I never thought I would say it but I don't see any way we could vote for anyone on offense MVP right now other than Gardner, and I think it's hand's down.

And no I wouldn't consider Portis productive right now, if you measure production on average you will find he is below average, and if you measure production by contract then he's a bust right now, let's face it you said a lot of a WR's success is due to the QB, well so is the RB's, the sooner we get Brunell out of there the sooner player's will start filling their potential.

There are to many on this board who want to hold Ramsey to a higher accountability than Brunell, that's just not fair, Brunell was the guy brought here to step right in and be productive because of his experience, and here we are grooming a 34 year old over the hill QB with a lot of recent injury problem's, many want to bring up rookies like B. Roth and compare Ramsey to him, well how bout comparing a seasoned veteran to BR? It's obvious Brunell isn't capable of outplaying a rookie! Brunell is obviously not who Gibb's felt he would be. peace out!

uh, our whole offense is way below average. Portis has the majority of our offensive yards, and thats in spite of every defense stacking the line, something Gardner benefits greatly from. stop rationalizing. as bad as our offense is, the run has set up the pass by far. no one is doubling Gardner. when they stack the line, they are essentially tripling Portis. he's done the most with the least help, not even a FB to lead block for him, and his presence has done the most for this offense. he just can't do it alone. even one-dimensional teams like Denver and Minnesota, have a great oLine and passer, some other element to the mix. we have neither.

[offiss]

Originally Posted by illdefined

uh, our whole offense is way below average. Portis has the majority of our offensive yards, and thats in spite of every defense stacking the line, something Gardner benefits greatly from. stop rationalizing. as bad as our offense is, the run has set up the pass by far. no one is doubling Gardner. when they stack the line, they are essentially tripling Portis. he's done the most with the least help, not even a FB to lead block for him, and his presence has done the most for this offense. he just can't do it alone. even one-dimensional teams like Denver and Minnesota, have a great oLine and passer, some other element to the mix. we have neither.

There is absolutly no rational to your statement.

1- you have stated that the wr's benefit from the QB

2- you have stated that the QB stink's [regardless of why]

3- you have stated that Portis isn't productive because Brunell can't throw

4- you have stated that Portis is opening the passing game

5- then you state we have neither a passing game or a running game

6- then you stated that the running game BY FAR has set up the passing game even though we have neither

Yet you refuse to give Gardner credit for having more of an impact on the games than Portis.

So let me sum this up as I see it,

Portis is the team's MVP right now even though we have no running game

Portis is responsible for Gardner's success even though we have no running game.


Gardner should thank Portis for not being able to run, and Brunell for not being able to throw, for the success he has had so far?