Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Redskins-Saints Offensive Review

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-17-2008, 01:11 AM   #1
Sheriff Gonna Getcha
Franchise Player
 
Sheriff Gonna Getcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 8,317
Re: Redskins-Saints Offensive Review

Great work. One question though, we only ran a 4 WR set once? I swear I saw several 4 WR sets and I don't think I mistook Davis for a WR.
Sheriff Gonna Getcha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2008, 02:10 AM   #2
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
Re: Redskins-Saints Offensive Review

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheriff Gonna Getcha View Post
Great work. One question though, we only ran a 4 WR set once? I swear I saw several 4 WR sets and I don't think I mistook Davis for a WR.
We ran 4 WR personnel one time the Saints called a T.O.

Other than that, Cooley was always counted as a tight end, even when he was flexed. So if Cooley was in the slot, and the Redskins had Moss, Randle El, and Thrash in the game, with Portis as a single back, I marked it as 3 WRs.

I do this because teams defend this package predominantly with the nickel, where as they often throw in another DB if a team goes 4-wide against them.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.00977 seconds with 11 queries