Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Fielding a competitive team

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-23-2008, 11:56 AM   #1
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,832
Re: Fielding a competitive team

Seems pretty sunk to me. 1-4 is impossible now. Guess you might want to try on ES for size.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2008, 01:54 PM   #2
Skinny Tee
The Starter
 
Skinny Tee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Redskins Nation
Posts: 1,715
Re: Fielding a competitive team

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72 View Post
Seems pretty sunk to me. 1-4 is impossible now. Guess you might want to try on ES for size.
Nah I'm not going to ES...I'll just read until the offseason.

Quote:
Originally Posted by hooskins View Post
haha now you are pulling at straws. Fair enough though, if you do keep to you word then that is respectable.
Well, it's just as impossible for the Skins to be 1-4 in Week 5 as it is impossible for them to be 1-4 in Week 3.


I factored that into the declaration being that the season would be 1/3 over by Week 5. BTW...offseason is defined as the start of the Redskins offseason, which may or may not be earlier than the start of the NFL's offseason post-superbowl. Hail to the Redskins!
__________________
Redskinsly,
_________Skinny Tee_________
Skinny Tee is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.19928 seconds with 11 queries