Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Redskins Offense: What's the Problem?

Locker Room Main Forum


View Poll Results: What's wrong with the offense?
Offensive Line 129 56.09%
Playcalling 18 7.83%
Receivers 8 3.48%
Quarterback 16 6.96%
Injuries 3 1.30%
Combination or other 56 24.35%
Voters: 230. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-20-2008, 02:29 PM   #1
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Redskins Offense: What's the Problem?

If the receivers are the problem, then it wouldn't be the receivers who are actually on the field regularly, Moss and Randle El?

Kelly and Thomas will be just fine, I thought Kelly would be further along than DT at this point but it's just crazy to start writing them off 10 games into their careers.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2008, 02:34 PM   #2
GMScud
Swearinger
 
GMScud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
Re: Redskins Offense: What's the Problem?

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
If the receivers are the problem, then it wouldn't be the receivers who are actually on the field regularly, Moss and Randle El?

Kelly and Thomas will be just fine, I thought Kelly would be further along than DT at this point but it's just crazy to start writing them off 10 games into their careers.
I would love to see breakout games from these guys this weekend. If they can come on down the stretch, that can be a massive factor in our playoff run. These words from Zorn on Kelly make all warm and fuzzy:

"He did pretty good. Real good," Zorn said of Kelly. "The thing that shows up right away, when Malcolm is out there, is that you can throw a vicinity pass, just a pass in the vicinity, and he's going to snag it. He has an easy way of catching the football. He makes something that could be spectacular for somebody else just look fairly easy. It's impressive. We've just got to hope he can continue."

Yes coach, we certainly hope he can.
__________________
Tardy
GMScud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2008, 04:14 PM   #3
53Fan
Franchise Player
 
53Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kill Devil Hills, N.C.
Posts: 7,570
Re: Redskins Offense: What's the Problem?

Quote:
Originally Posted by GMScud View Post
I would love to see breakout games from these guys this weekend. If they can come on down the stretch, that can be a massive factor in our playoff run. These words from Zorn on Kelly make all warm and fuzzy:

"He did pretty good. Real good," Zorn said of Kelly. "The thing that shows up right away, when Malcolm is out there, is that you can throw a vicinity pass, just a pass in the vicinity, and he's going to snag it. He has an easy way of catching the football. He makes something that could be spectacular for somebody else just look fairly easy. It's impressive. We've just got to hope he can continue."

Yes coach, we certainly hope he can.
I think we may be closer than people think. Kelly could make a huge difference in the red zone and Devin has already proven he can get open. It's just taking longer than I expected. For these guys to bust out now would be perfect!
__________________
Defense wins championships. Bring it!
53Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2008, 12:46 AM   #4
70Chip
Playmaker
 
70Chip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Manassas
Age: 54
Posts: 3,048
Re: Redskins Offense: What's the Problem?

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
If the receivers are the problem, then it wouldn't be the receivers who are actually on the field regularly, Moss and Randle El?

Kelly and Thomas will be just fine, I thought Kelly would be further along than DT at this point but it's just crazy to start writing them off 10 games into their careers.
They had Moss and El and they still drafted three big receivers with their top picks. I think the logic was, "They can't all be busts". Well. In this offense, with all the slants and other shortish routes, we need a big receiver that can muscle the defensive backs. That's what I see.

I know people get made fun of when they bring Madden in, but when Zorn was hired, I switched my Madden playbook to Holmgren, and it is brutal to try to get a deep pass with that offense and our personell. And I'm not nearly as careful with the ball as Jason. I heave it. There aren't enough combinations and deep breaks for guys to get open.

Furthermore, the reluctance to use motion and formation shifts is not helping our pass pro issues. You can shift a defense like Pittsburgh's out of blitzes or you can at least force the issue away from pressure. These West Coast followers are too dogmatic about not using shifts and motion. A blitzing defense still has to cover and when you shift or motion they have to adjust. That's why teams do it. It slows them down. You also force favorable matchups. This is how I see it.
__________________
This Monkey's Gone to Heaven
70Chip is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.39333 seconds with 12 queries