![]() |
![]() |
#106 |
\m/
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,845
|
Re: JC is not what I thought part two
Big no to McNabb, that makes no sense.
|
![]() |
![]() |
Advertisements |
![]() |
#107 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: close to the edge
Posts: 4,926
|
Re: JC is not what I thought part two
Quote:
plus their D is still a wrecking ball of a unit even with gregg out. when we play them it will be a great game. go skins!! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#108 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,575
|
Re: JC is not what I thought part two
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#109 |
Playmaker
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,159
|
Re: JC is not what I thought part two
Matty:
I agree that the Skins should not take that trade - - but for those who think Campbell is not up to the job, this would be a potential "quick fix". And we do know that the Skins have been known to jump at the "quick fix" option in the past...
__________________
The Sports Curmudgeon www.sportscurmudgeon.com But don't get me wrong, I love sports... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#110 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Age: 52
Posts: 2,841
|
Re: JC is not what I thought part two
You can't be serious? First of all that's a big trade in the division and that just doesn't happen. Secondly haven't we had enough old players from other teams for one lifetime.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#111 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Apr 2008
Age: 37
Posts: 683
|
Re: JC is not what I thought part two
hell no laRon is a young beast and mcnabb is old and is on the downslope
__________________
never another.....R.I.P. Sean T #21 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#112 | |
Special Teams
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 432
|
Re: JC is not what I thought part two
Quote:
But thats the one thing i love about Tony Romo he does drop deep also but he knows how to side step and step forward into the pocket. Campbell does drop too deep sometimes but once it collapse he goes into panic mode.
__________________
I laugh at you Colt Brennan haters. You're the same guys who didn't wanna bench Brunell for Campbell. The tables will turn. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#113 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 4,153
|
Re: JC is not what I thought part two
Quote:
I agree. Damn why get a man that is on the downside of his career as a starter when you need to find your franchise guy ala Theismann, Jorgensen, etc? Evaluate JC the rest of the way, look at potential diamonds in the rough in the draft and young QB FAs, and let open the QB spot up for the best man. I pushed for JC over Brunell since we drafted him, but it looks like his early detractors were right about him benefitting at Auburn from having two 1st round HBs lining up behind him. It is hard to justify giving this guy 7 years to learn the pro game, when Matt Ryan and Joe Flacco, rookies, can seemingly ease into the position and excel off the bat. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#114 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: JC is not what I thought part two
Well, 4th year Campbell is significantly better than Rookie Flacco, but Flacco certainly isn't struggling...I mean he's having the best year of any QB in his division. And I think you have to credit the offense around him for that.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#115 |
Naega jeil jal naga
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 40
Posts: 14,750
|
Re: JC is not what I thought part two
Once again this isn't Madden. And even if it was this would be a horrible trade.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice." - Scooter "I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now." - FRPLG |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#116 |
The Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Berlin, MD
Posts: 2,061
|
Re: JC is not what I thought part two
The offense around him has been the nfl worst, since the inception of the Ravens.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#117 |
The Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Berlin, MD
Posts: 2,061
|
Re: JC is not what I thought part two
JC is simply not getting it done. He is not finding recievers and he is way to concervative with the ball. He simply can not sustain drives, and is inept in the red zone.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#118 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: JC is not what I thought part two
Right, but this isn't 2002. Clayton/Mason are a very competent WR duo, and the Ravens have a strong, retooled OL.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#119 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 4,153
|
Re: JC is not what I thought part two
Quote:
The Moss-Randle El duo were supposed to be just as lethal as those two are. I don't think a retooled OL alone is going to make JC a great QB and I do not want to wait for another 2-3 seasons for them to retool the OL only to find JC still is inadequate. Evaluate JC the rest of the way then the FO has to make a decision about him and they should open the QB position for competition in the preseason. Either the kid has it or he doesn't. Patrick Ramsey didn't get half the sympathy this kid gets. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#120 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Berlin, MD
Posts: 2,061
|
Re: JC is not what I thought part two
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|