Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


JC is not what I thought part two

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-01-2008, 01:43 PM   #106
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,845
Re: JC is not what I thought part two

Big no to McNabb, that makes no sense.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 12-01-2008, 01:43 PM   #107
over the mountain
Playmaker
 
over the mountain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: close to the edge
Posts: 4,926
Re: JC is not what I thought part two

Quote:
Originally Posted by T.O.Killa View Post
He is making passes when he needs to and he is a rookie getting better every week. With Flacco 8-4 without 6-10.
livin in bmore ive watched alot of the ravens and this year they have been healthier at the cb than last year (they still are dinged up alot) and rookie coach harbaugh isnt asking flacco to win games, instead hes asking him to manage games by putting him in managebale situations much like the pats did with cassel early on. so far flacco has responded well and seems to have a bright future.

plus their D is still a wrecking ball of a unit even with gregg out.

when we play them it will be a great game.

go skins!!
over the mountain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2008, 01:56 PM   #108
irish
Playmaker
 
irish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,575
Re: JC is not what I thought part two

Quote:
Originally Posted by sportscurmudgeon View Post
Folks:

There is at least a 30% chance that the Eagles would trade Donovan McNabb at the end of this season.


SUPPOSE the Eagles offered an even-up trade:

McNabb for LaRon Landry.


Anyone here want to take that trade to get McNabb???
No way.
irish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2008, 01:57 PM   #109
sportscurmudgeon
Playmaker
 
sportscurmudgeon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,159
Re: JC is not what I thought part two

Matty:

I agree that the Skins should not take that trade - - but for those who think Campbell is not up to the job, this would be a potential "quick fix".

And we do know that the Skins have been known to jump at the "quick fix" option in the past...
__________________
The Sports Curmudgeon
www.sportscurmudgeon.com
But don't get me wrong, I love sports...
sportscurmudgeon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2008, 02:20 PM   #110
wilsowilso
Registered User
 
wilsowilso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Age: 52
Posts: 2,841
Re: JC is not what I thought part two

Quote:
Originally Posted by sportscurmudgeon View Post
Folks:

There is at least a 30% chance that the Eagles would trade Donovan McNabb at the end of this season.


SUPPOSE the Eagles offered an even-up trade:

McNabb for LaRon Landry.


Anyone here want to take that trade to get McNabb???
You can't be serious? First of all that's a big trade in the division and that just doesn't happen. Secondly haven't we had enough old players from other teams for one lifetime.
wilsowilso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2008, 02:23 PM   #111
Bubba305-ST21-
Impact Rookie
 
Bubba305-ST21-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Age: 37
Posts: 683
Re: JC is not what I thought part two

hell no laRon is a young beast and mcnabb is old and is on the downslope
__________________
never another.....R.I.P. Sean T #21
Bubba305-ST21- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2008, 02:29 PM   #112
prinzeofmoval
Special Teams
 
prinzeofmoval's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 432
Re: JC is not what I thought part two

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paintrain View Post
Dropping too deep?? Do you understand ANYTHING about the QB position?

So you see him locking onto receivers but Zorn says, if anything, he moves off his receivers too quickly? Hmm..

Specifically what poor decisions is he making? Last I checked he's got the fewest interceptions of a starting QB in the league. Doesn't that reflect good decision making?

Zorn is unfailingly honest. If Campbell was stinking, he'd say it. When everyone killed Thomas for dropping the 1st down against Dallas, Zorn put it completely on Campbell. When Sellers dropped the TD last week, Zorn put it on Campbell. He's not coddling JC in the media to protect his feelings.

It'd really be simpler if you just said you don't like Campbell, never have and never will rather than trying to formulate an argument that clearly has zero merit.

But thats the one thing i love about Tony Romo he does drop deep also but he knows how to side step and step forward into the pocket. Campbell does drop too deep sometimes but once it collapse he goes into panic mode.
__________________
I laugh at you Colt Brennan haters. You're the same guys who didn't wanna bench Brunell for Campbell. The tables will turn.
prinzeofmoval is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2008, 03:14 PM   #113
GusFrerotte
Registered User
 
GusFrerotte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 4,153
Re: JC is not what I thought part two

Quote:
Originally Posted by wilsowilso View Post
You can't be serious? First of all that's a big trade in the division and that just doesn't happen. Secondly haven't we had enough old players from other teams for one lifetime.

I agree. Damn why get a man that is on the downside of his career as a starter when you need to find your franchise guy ala Theismann, Jorgensen, etc? Evaluate JC the rest of the way, look at potential diamonds in the rough in the draft and young QB FAs, and let open the QB spot up for the best man. I pushed for JC over Brunell since we drafted him, but it looks like his early detractors were right about him benefitting at Auburn from having two 1st round HBs lining up behind him. It is hard to justify giving this guy 7 years to learn the pro game, when Matt Ryan and Joe Flacco, rookies, can seemingly ease into the position and excel off the bat.
GusFrerotte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2008, 03:39 PM   #114
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
Re: JC is not what I thought part two

Quote:
Originally Posted by SirClintonPortis View Post
Ravens are ranked 27th in the leauge in passing. Flacco has had very few 200+ yard games in passing. Maybe they have had shorter fields to go, but they also faced a bunch of weak teams...
Well, 4th year Campbell is significantly better than Rookie Flacco, but Flacco certainly isn't struggling...I mean he's having the best year of any QB in his division. And I think you have to credit the offense around him for that.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2008, 03:39 PM   #115
Dirtbag59
Naega jeil jal naga
 
Dirtbag59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 40
Posts: 14,750
Re: JC is not what I thought part two

Quote:
Originally Posted by sportscurmudgeon View Post
Folks:

There is at least a 30% chance that the Eagles would trade Donovan McNabb at the end of this season.


SUPPOSE the Eagles offered an even-up trade:

McNabb for LaRon Landry.


Anyone here want to take that trade to get McNabb???
Once again this isn't Madden. And even if it was this would be a horrible trade.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice."
- Scooter

"I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now."
- FRPLG
Dirtbag59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2008, 03:42 PM   #116
T.O.Killa
The Starter
 
T.O.Killa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Berlin, MD
Posts: 2,061
Re: JC is not what I thought part two

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
Well, 4th year Campbell is significantly better than Rookie Flacco, but Flacco certainly isn't struggling...I mean he's having the best year of any QB in his division. And I think you have to credit the offense around him for that.
The offense around him has been the nfl worst, since the inception of the Ravens.
T.O.Killa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2008, 03:45 PM   #117
T.O.Killa
The Starter
 
T.O.Killa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Berlin, MD
Posts: 2,061
Re: JC is not what I thought part two

JC is simply not getting it done. He is not finding recievers and he is way to concervative with the ball. He simply can not sustain drives, and is inept in the red zone.
T.O.Killa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2008, 03:50 PM   #118
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
Re: JC is not what I thought part two

Quote:
Originally Posted by T.O.Killa View Post
The offense around him has been the nfl worst, since the inception of the Ravens.
Right, but this isn't 2002. Clayton/Mason are a very competent WR duo, and the Ravens have a strong, retooled OL.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2008, 04:14 PM   #119
GusFrerotte
Registered User
 
GusFrerotte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 4,153
Re: JC is not what I thought part two

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
Right, but this isn't 2002. Clayton/Mason are a very competent WR duo, and the Ravens have a strong, retooled OL.

The Moss-Randle El duo were supposed to be just as lethal as those two are. I don't think a retooled OL alone is going to make JC a great QB and I do not want to wait for another 2-3 seasons for them to retool the OL only to find JC still is inadequate. Evaluate JC the rest of the way then the FO has to make a decision about him and they should open the QB position for competition in the preseason. Either the kid has it or he doesn't. Patrick Ramsey didn't get half the sympathy this kid gets.
GusFrerotte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2008, 04:22 PM   #120
T.O.Killa
The Starter
 
T.O.Killa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Berlin, MD
Posts: 2,061
Re: JC is not what I thought part two

Quote:
Originally Posted by GusFrerotte View Post
The Moss-Randle El duo were supposed to be just as lethal as those two are. I don't think a retooled OL alone is going to make JC a great QB and I do not want to wait for another 2-3 seasons for them to retool the OL only to find JC still is inadequate. Evaluate JC the rest of the way then the FO has to make a decision about him and they should open the QB position for competition in the preseason. Either the kid has it or he doesn't. Patrick Ramsey didn't get half the sympathy this kid gets.
I agree.
T.O.Killa is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.81781 seconds with 12 queries