Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Blache Excited About Returning

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-26-2008, 09:04 PM   #1
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 52
Posts: 99,832
Re: Blache Excited About Returning

Drafting a RB high would be pretty dumb. It's just not a pressing need.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2008, 06:27 PM   #2
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
Re: Blache Excited About Returning

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72 View Post
Drafting a RB high would be pretty dumb. It's just not a pressing need.
Well, all the pressing needs on this team (given the assumption of the WRs developing) are on the OL, so while the pick should go there, a BPA pick at the RB position would give us a nice boost to the running game, which we need.

I am in no way implying that a RB will or might be the best player available when we pick in round one.

And there are plenty of other holes on this team that seem more pressing, but I would argue that explosively talented RB that compliments Portis is a need. But it's one that we could easily satify in round 5 or 6 if we aren't in love with any of the highly touted RBs.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.00123 seconds with 11 queries