2009 Redskins Roster - Cap Burdens

BigHairedAristocrat · 01-05-2009, 10:08 AM

We need to get rid of Moss and/or ARE. They cost roughly the same to trade as they do to keep. If we could get a 3rd rounder for Moss or a 5th rounder for ARE, we should do it.

Schneed10 · 01-05-2009, 10:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigHairedAristocrat

We need to get rid of Moss and/or ARE. They cost roughly the same to trade as they do to keep. If we could get a 3rd rounder for Moss or a 5th rounder for ARE, we should do it.

I guess if the goal is to make the team worse, that would make sense.

I have a hard time seeing how getting rid of a starting player for a 3rd round pick while gaining no cap space in the process would benefit the team.

01-05-2009, 10:08 AM	#1
BigHairedAristocrat Playmaker Join Date: Dec 2008 Posts: 4,712	Re: 2009 Redskins Roster - Cap Burdens We need to get rid of Moss and/or ARE. They cost roughly the same to trade as they do to keep. If we could get a 3rd rounder for Moss or a 5th rounder for ARE, we should do it. __________________ Dolphins get good press for saving drowning humans.But we only hear about the swimmers theyve pushed ashore.You know who we havent heard from: all the people theyve pushed out to sea.Dolphins dont know what theyre doing-they just like pushing things.

2009 Redskins Roster - Cap Burdens

Locker Room Main Forum