Updated: Evaluating the QB Situation (Discuss Campbell, Colt, etc)

[T.O.Killa]

Originally Posted by GMScud

Benched him in favor of whom? Why, because he didn't set the world on fire in his first year running the WCO with an overall mediocre receiving corps?

This blog link is just stating the obvious - his contract is up after 2009, therefore we could part ways after the '09 season.

I would have started with Todd Collins. He went 4-0 last season.

[GTripp0012]

Originally Posted by T.O.Killa

I would have started with Todd Collins. He went 4-0 last season.

And if he hadn't been mercilessly eliminated from the playoffs after that, he would have gone 0-4 there.

[GMScud]

Originally Posted by T.O.Killa

I would have started with Todd Collins. He went 4-0 last season.

And then he got a contract extension and proceeded to look lost and lousy in training camp and preseason. When Collins took us on our run in he was the beneficiary of a team on a mission after ST's murder, plus he was running a system he'd been in for years under Saunders.

Todd Collins is an old backup. That's it.

[REDSKIN1]

Originally Posted by GMScud

And then he got a contract extension and proceeded to look lost and lousy in training camp and preseason. When Collins took us on our run in he was the beneficiary of a team on a mission after ST's murder, plus he was running a system he'd been in for years under Saunders.

Todd Collins is an old backup. That's it.

I second this notion..

[The Goat]

Originally Posted by T.O.Killa

I would have started with Todd Collins. He went 4-0 last season.

Starting Collins would have only made sense if the FO had retained Williams as HC and put the offense in the hands of Saunders. I'm one of the few who thought this was the wise move and still today i believe we'd have been a very competitive playoff team under Williams/Saunders... it wasn't meant to be. Collins has little to nothing to offer in the WCO. Jason is the best QB on our roster.