![]() |
|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#11 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
|
Re: Holt released by Rams
Ok, for those of you who don't want Holt, may I ask the reason?
You can't say he's too old, we have Thrash on the team who is older. You can't say he sucks because of one bad yr, due to team injuries. That would be like saying JC sucks simply cause the OL had issues. You can't say he's another teams cast off cause I think most of us agree he was let go due to his high salary not due to his production last yr. Most would agree he's an upgrade to our WR corpse so the only reason I can figure out is that you all just want to see what Kelly and Thomas bring to the table and so they will get experience. I'll agree the more playing time they get the better they will be, but I'm baffled as to why anyone would want to keep Thrash over Holt? Everyone wanted a young WR out of the draft or most did. We got two. Everyone was satisfied thinking they were going to start right a way and be our CJ, T.O., or Randy Moss. How wrong we were. One didn't get in due to injuries the other played a limited role and only caught what....2 passes? I would count the third but is was brought back. So if you ask me this yr was a wash. If they get any significant playing time this yr I would count it as their Rookie yr playing. Especially for Kelly. Having said that you guys are willing to bank that our two WR's from last yrs draft are going to come out and knock the socks off other teams? I have faith in the team but would always like an insurance policy in case for what ever reason Kelly has to go under the knife again, or Thomas still has not matured and not running good routes. If for any reason the two don't step up atleast I would feel more confortable going into the season with Moss, Holt, ARE instead of Moss, ARE, Thrash. |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|