|
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
03-20-2009, 04:58 PM
|
#1 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Age: 42
Posts: 2,726
|
Re: Which Player Would You Take at #13 who doesn't fill a need?
I didn't know that the Redskins were allowed to take anyone but Alex Mack.
__________________
"I would change that around, Jesus isn't Cutler. I guarantee you Jesus couldnt thread the ball like Jay does."-Monksdown |
|
|
|
03-20-2009, 05:28 PM
|
#2 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,378
|
Re: Which Player Would You Take at #13 who doesn't fill a need?
Quote:
__________________
R.I.P. #21 |
|
|
|
|
|
03-20-2009, 06:37 PM
|
#3 |
|
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 57
|
Re: Which Player Would You Take at #13 who doesn't fill a need?
Pick Crabtree or Harvin at 13th. In 3rd round, pick Britton, or Loadholt to address OT position. A. Mack would be great but he will likely be gone by 3rd round easily. Perry doesn't impress me all that much. He's decent but not elite enough for a 1st round pick.
|
|
|
|
|
03-20-2009, 06:41 PM
|
#4 |
|
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 57
|
Re: Which Player Would You Take at #13 who doesn't fill a need?
An elite WR would give us the best weapon to be contended with. Portis in the backfield, Cooley at TE, Moss and #13 pick WR at wideouts, then add Randel El, Thomas, Or Kelly in the mix makes for an Arsenal not to be taken lightly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hybrid Mode
