Mark Sanchez at 13th?

Beemnseven · 04-15-2009, 08:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theJBexperience

Are you kidding?

Two years ago, many people on this board were freaking out, saying we already had Sean Taylor, when reports came out about this time saying the Skins were going to draft Laron Landry.

And last year about this time, even more people were freaking out, saying we've already got Anthony Mix, when reports came out saying the Skins were high on Malcolm Kelly.

We all know how that turned out. Face it. We'll most likely trade up to get Mark Sanchez. Hopefully, we can trade JC, so it at least makes some sense.

Yeah, and don't forget that in 2005, Len Pasquarelli broke the news a day or so before the draft that we were trading away our 2006 first rounder to Denver to get Jason Campbell.

I guess they keep the windows and doors open in our draft war room.

The Goat · 04-15-2009, 09:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

If we're going to go after Sanchez then we might as well just cut bait with Campbell now (and we better stock up on more first day picks). Too bad this isn't like the NBA where you'll see something like Campbell, Moss, and Golston all traded in one deal for multiple picks and/or players.

I don't know how much true interest we have in Sanchez, to the extent that we would trade up to get him. For everyone upset we lost our 2nd rounder to the Dolphins maybe we should be happy we don't have it right now to use in a trade up for Sanchez. We definitely like those USC guys overall though. I worry though that some of the "deciders" in the organization, believe they can magically recreate a Matt Ryan season with Sanchez.

I wouldn't be terribly surprised to see us use/waste? a 2010 first day pick to trade up to make sure we get...someone other than Sanchez.

Plus we have Colt!

Bro if we trade up for anyone other than Curry, Monroe or Jason Smith i'm gonna, well once again i'm gonna toss my glass at the tv

mrreddman · 04-15-2009, 09:24 PM

Sanchez has to be a smokescreen. I mean our FO can't really be that stupid could they?
I think he will be a fine QB, but like most QB's it's gonna take a few years to even get to JC's current level. I think he would be nice value at #13, but just not a good fit in any way for this team considering our needs. And if we trade up to get him??...that would be INSANE!
We have too many other needs and not enough picks to consider taking any QB in this draft. Now if they traded JC to the Jets for #17 or Lions at #20 I might think about Sanchez at #13, but that is highly unlikely. We have to get a RT, SLB and hopefully a DE somehow out of this draft.

Not to change the subject but if Raji fell to #13..should the skins take him? Slide Big Al to DE and our DL would be straight!

Lotus · 04-15-2009, 09:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrreddman

Sanchez has to be a smokescreen. I mean our FO can't really be that stupid could they?
I think he will be a fine QB, but like most QB's it's gonna take a few years to even get to JC's current level. I think he would be nice value at #13, but just not a good fit in any way for this team considering our needs. And if we trade up to get him??...that would be INSANE!
We have too many other needs and not enough picks to consider taking any QB in this draft. Now if they traded JC to the Jets for #17 or Lions at #20 I might think about Sanchez at #13, but that is highly unlikely. We have to get a RT, SLB and hopefully a DE somehow out of this draft.

Not to change the subject but if Raji fell to #13..should the skins take him? Slide Big Al to DE and our DL would be straight!

If Raji fell to 13 I might just take him, but I would not slide AH to DE. Instead I'd trade one of our other DT's and just be badass up the middle on D.

mrreddman · 04-15-2009, 09:43 PM

Well Id like Al at DE on 1st and 2nd down with Raji, Griffin, and AC. Rotate Golston, Monty,
Daniels with Jackson and Wilson at rush DE. We got to move Al around like Reggie White. Make it more difficult for teams to game plan for him.

53Fan · 04-15-2009, 09:48 PM

I think it was Merrill Hodge who said if Haynesworth decided to play DE, he'd automatically become the best DE in the NFL. If Blache is smart he'll move him around a little.

mrreddman · 04-15-2009, 09:57 PM

I think we have to play Big AL at DE. We have plenty of DT's, and there is nobody worthy of the #13 pick at DE. AND nobody on the roster who gives us anything at DE other than AC and maybe Daniels IF he is healthy. It's not like Big Al wouldn't be effective there.

SmootSmack · 04-15-2009, 09:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by freddyg12

who?

I don't know. I don't think they'll trade up for an OL, but Orakpo? Maybe Maybin?

The Goat · 04-15-2009, 09:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 53Fan

I think it was Merrill Hodge who said if Haynesworth decided to play DE, he'd automatically become the best DE in the NFL. If Blache is smart he'll move him around a little.

Been thinking the same thing bro...part of the reason I think DE is a reach for us @ 13. I mean if Monty plays up to his potential (hoping Al has something to do w/ that) we're already better in the interior...kick Al out to LDE and let him collapse the pocket in about half a second cuz now way a TE/OT double team will stop him.

Redskin Jim · 04-15-2009, 09:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 53Fan

I think it was Merrill Hodge who said if Haynesworth decided to play DE, he'd automatically become the best DE in the NFL. If Blache is smart he'll move him around a little.

I'm salivating right now thinking about Raji, And shifting AH around on the o-line... LOL!

SmootSmack · 04-15-2009, 10:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Beemnseven

Yeah, and don't forget that in 2005, Len Pasquarelli broke the news a day or so before the draft that we were trading away our 2006 first rounder to Denver to get Jason Campbell.

I guess they keep the windows and doors open in our draft war room.

True, but last year at this time I think JLC had us taking Phillip Merling, Kiper had us taking Talib, and Mayock had us taking Sweed.

T.O.Killa · 04-15-2009, 10:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

True, but last year at this time I think JLC had us taking Phillip Merling, Kiper had us taking Talib, and Mayock had us taking Sweed.

I respect Maycock's opinion the most. At least he war right about us taking a WR.

53Fan · 04-15-2009, 10:11 PM

Montgomery has the size and talent to be a very good DT. Maybe AH will rub off on him a little. Raji and AH? OMG. Can you imagine?

53Fan · 04-15-2009, 10:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

True, but last year at this time I think JLC had us taking Phillip Merling, Kiper had us taking Talib, and Mayock had us taking Sweed.

I would imagine figuring out who the Redskins pick is not an easy task for anyone.

mrreddman · 04-15-2009, 10:18 PM

Yeah Raji and AH!! Just remember the skins were interested in Raji a lot before they signed AH. It would not surprise me at all if he slides to us if we take him. Our line would turn from a weakness into a dominating DL and we need a big physical line in the EAST for Jacobs and Barber.

04-15-2009, 09:24 PM	#228
mrreddman Special Teams Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: alexandria va Posts: 143	Re: Mark Sanchez at 13th? Sanchez has to be a smokescreen. I mean our FO can't really be that stupid could they? I think he will be a fine QB, but like most QB's it's gonna take a few years to even get to JC's current level. I think he would be nice value at #13, but just not a good fit in any way for this team considering our needs. And if we trade up to get him??...that would be INSANE! We have too many other needs and not enough picks to consider taking any QB in this draft. Now if they traded JC to the Jets for #17 or Lions at #20 I might think about Sanchez at #13, but that is highly unlikely. We have to get a RT, SLB and hopefully a DE somehow out of this draft. Not to change the subject but if Raji fell to #13..should the skins take him? Slide Big Al to DE and our DL would be straight!

04-15-2009, 09:43 PM	#230
mrreddman Special Teams Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: alexandria va Posts: 143	Re: Mark Sanchez at 13th? Well Id like Al at DE on 1st and 2nd down with Raji, Griffin, and AC. Rotate Golston, Monty, Daniels with Jackson and Wilson at rush DE. We got to move Al around like Reggie White. Make it more difficult for teams to game plan for him.

04-15-2009, 09:48 PM	#231
53Fan Franchise Player Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Kill Devil Hills, N.C. Posts: 7,570	Re: Mark Sanchez at 13th? I think it was Merrill Hodge who said if Haynesworth decided to play DE, he'd automatically become the best DE in the NFL. If Blache is smart he'll move him around a little. __________________ Defense wins championships. Bring it!

04-15-2009, 09:57 PM	#232
mrreddman Special Teams Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: alexandria va Posts: 143	Re: Mark Sanchez at 13th? I think we have to play Big AL at DE. We have plenty of DT's, and there is nobody worthy of the #13 pick at DE. AND nobody on the roster who gives us anything at DE other than AC and maybe Daniels IF he is healthy. It's not like Big Al wouldn't be effective there.

04-15-2009, 10:11 PM	#238
53Fan Franchise Player Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Kill Devil Hills, N.C. Posts: 7,570	Re: Mark Sanchez at 13th? Montgomery has the size and talent to be a very good DT. Maybe AH will rub off on him a little. Raji and AH? OMG. Can you imagine? __________________ Defense wins championships. Bring it!

04-15-2009, 10:18 PM	#240
mrreddman Special Teams Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: alexandria va Posts: 143	Re: Mark Sanchez at 13th? Yeah Raji and AH!! Just remember the skins were interested in Raji a lot before they signed AH. It would not surprise me at all if he slides to us if we take him. Our line would turn from a weakness into a dominating DL and we need a big physical line in the EAST for Jacobs and Barber.

Mark Sanchez at 13th?

Locker Room Main Forum