Thrash lowers salary cap number

SKINSnCANES · 03-31-2004, 02:19 AM

Trading Gardner for what everyone assumes is fair value would not make sense. Hes not a headache like Boston and T.O., were not pushing ot get rid of him. He counts for nill against the cap and was our former first round pick. What sense woud it make to get a 4th round practice squad player for him. Until he needs a new contract, and unless he wants big money they should keep him and the depth they have at receiver. We're had to many teams in recent years with no depth and were at a disadvantage when anyone got hurt.

BleedBurgundy · 03-31-2004, 02:25 AM

If someone is willing to give us a second rounder, we should take it. IMHO. But I agree, for a 4th round pick, the value are too different.

03-31-2004, 02:19 AM	#1
SKINSnCANES Pro Bowl Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: New Jersey Age: 43 Posts: 5,455	Trading Gardner for what everyone assumes is fair value would not make sense. Hes not a headache like Boston and T.O., were not pushing ot get rid of him. He counts for nill against the cap and was our former first round pick. What sense woud it make to get a 4th round practice squad player for him. Until he needs a new contract, and unless he wants big money they should keep him and the depth they have at receiver. We're had to many teams in recent years with no depth and were at a disadvantage when anyone got hurt. __________________ "I'm used to winning, coming from the University of Miami. " Clinton Portis

03-31-2004, 02:25 AM	#2
BleedBurgundy Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 4,471	If someone is willing to give us a second rounder, we should take it. IMHO. But I agree, for a 4th round pick, the value are too different.

Thrash lowers salary cap number

Locker Room Main Forum