Best or Worst 2009 Draft moves...?

[Lotus]

Originally Posted by redskingrove

There have been several rumors about the rumor mill for the Redskins draft strategy. Give your opinion as to why it would be a good move or not.

1. Scenario 1: Redskins trade 1st, 3rd, and 6th round picks with Cleveland to move up to the 5th overall pick.

2. Scenario 2: Redskins stay put with all their picks and hope the impact players they need fall to them.

3. Scenario 3: Redskins trade down to gain extra picks and go for mid level draft picks.

* Given the above scenarios, add in who you believe the Redskins should target in each scenario to give your opinion "teeth".

1. Bad idea. We have too many holes to fill. We need several solid players, not one great one.

2. Not my favorite scenario but I would not mind too much if we took the BPA in terms of OT, SLB, or DE. Orakpo, Ayers, Oher, or maybe Matthews would work (although 13 is high for Matthews). If Raji were still on the board I'd like him as BPA regardless of position.

3. My favorite scenario. Same idea: BPA at OT, SLB, or DE. Britton, Beatty, Matthews, Sidbury, even take Mack, Levitre, or Duke Robinson even though they don't meet my listed positions, depending on how far we traded down, what picks we got, who's left, etc.