Zorn: 'We're Further Ahead' This Year

[saden1]

Originally Posted by Lotus

Purely statistically, I am likely older than you, so I could not be your "son."

From the standpoint of logic, ad hominem arguments (where you attack the person, not the argument) are always fallacious. They are always logically bankrupt. Ad hominem arguments also make you look foolish. So please, for the benefit of us both in the future, discuss my views rather than attacking my person.

So, back to the point: How is Zorn's calling the young WR's "sad" in your words "hyping shit?" Or is Zorn more honest than you give him credit for?

You should explore reading article linked to in the first post of the thread. Also, I'm entirely convinced you understand what ad hominem argument is.